yep it can carry on those aswell
Tbf tho, R-37M doesnt have any NATO equivalents either atm, and China has the PL-21
you expect Gaijin gonna let us humiliate their beloved Russia like that? they won’t even fix tanks armor to how it supposed to work.
1 Like
Not sure about that actually. I think it was 6 IRIS-T and 6 Meteor as a max payload
Isn’t R-37M only really designed for knocking out things like AWAKS and tankers at long range?
well it also screws the US as well at they have no equivalent
Typhoon FGR4, armed with, 4-6x 9Ls, 4-6x Skyflash DFs and 4x AGM-65B and TIALD 400 pod
1 Like
possible as seeing they won’t even let Gripen have something better than stupid skyflash (not even supertemp) and by some miracle that thing become more OP than X6 ER slinger.
SuperTEMP i kinda get that was developed for the Tornados.
But yeah. Like the BOL nerfs (which are 100% fake) and the other handicaps like the centre line weapons.
Yeah, I have no idea how it became so good, I still reckon its because Sweden and Britain have been playing with a full BR handicap for 12 months. Now we have an equal aircraft, we are just destroying the other nations. But the day we get Rafale and Typhoon, im going to have my popcorn ready for the US and USSR mains all moaning their asses off
1 Like
The AIM-9M is a development of the AIM-9L and replaced the latter on the production line. It features a reduced-smoke rocket motor, an improved guidance section designated WGU-4/B, better countermeasures resistance (IRCCM - Infrared Counter-Countermeasures), and improved overall reliability from Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles
Yeah yeah, I asked for source?
I can’t even call that equal really 9M is pretty much standard everyone had it around that BR now but grippen really can’t do BVR unlike other the only two thing that keep them not get eating alive is agility and BOL is Gripen bad? no it’s not far cry from it just not really can complete with other (for me it handing like Spitfire back in the day but now it top tier)
I said Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles
reduced but by how much
Yeah, though even with 9Ms
they could be given much better Lock ranges which would allow them to be used more effectively in situations like head-ons.
9Ms have quite a few outstanding bug reports actually, they should be a lot better than they are currently.
For Britain, I dont know if we will get AMRAAM. I see a 50/50 chance as they may keep it on par with the Gripen A which I suspect wont get AMRAAM. But the Swedish Gripen C with AMRAAM is going to be very good. Im just hoping the Sea Harrier FA2 doesnt get gimped
1 Like
Idk ask producent it should not be invisible bit reduced idk let’s guess 80-90% but still would be visible but hard to
Link? Something about the actual smoke? “Reduced smoke” from a generic description doesn’t say much.
I’m not calling you out I’m just curious if anyone has found a source on that smokeless motor yet
Well the source is Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles
I saw someones picture before of essentially no smoke at all, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a thing. Question is at what conditions
1 Like