Yes I was agreeing with you. But when we are on the forums we are an international community, I’m not saying that you have to put aside your own nation but you must also take into consideration issues of other nations. We should all be working together to fix all the vehicles including China they should make it in a major update with a major overhaul of both matchmaking and model correction in my opinion. But that’s just my opinion.
And by overhaul matchmaking I mean decompressing the BR system
I agree with you. The priority should be fixing the issues with Chinese vehicles first, and only then can we address the placement issue involving China, Japan, and Thailand. These two problems cannot be solved simultaneously; we have to tackle the vehicle fixes first. But what can we expect from a small company like Gaijin with its limited capabilities?
Then just start a new topic, is not like just because China TT is mistreated then you guys can use some invalid view point to undermine Thailand’s VT-4. Personally speaking if y’all protests about the bug fixing I definitely support, but after all of this I don’t think we are on the same side.
This ^^^
We’re 100% with you guys on the bug reporting and transparency side of things. We ALL want our vehicles performing how they should, and we ALL want Gaijin to justify why they believe our sources may or may not be valid.
Where the Chinese playerbase loses the rest of the playerbase is the issue of Thailand receiving the VT-4. Again, the standard has been everyone getting their IRL vehicles, both export and domestic, for years now.
The VT-4 going to Thailand isn’t the main issue, it’s the fact that it is going to the Japanese TT, especially during the month that Japan lost WW2.
I don’t really care if the Thai VT-4 comes or not, but people here really need to actually know what the Chinese perspective is, because it’s more complex than “exported tank getting exported=bad.”
2 Likes
And yet USSR exported Hungarian vehicles went to the Italian tech tree despite Italy being an Axis member and on the Western side of the Cold War…
Did Russian mains grumble and complain? A little, sure. But they didn’t have a full blown review bombing session because of it.
1 Like
Russia doesn’t have as much negative history with Italy than Japan and China.
I think we should’ve done something to prevent gaijin from making an air tree that is 100% copy and paste from either the German or Russian air tree.
2 Likes
But they also gotta know their perspective is invalid and unreasonable, if they really that hate this kind of thing due to some incident happened during 80 years ago then just let Gaijin removed all foreign vehicle in China TT. Those vehicle’s manufacturing countries are all more or less got some unsolving geopolitical issues with them and I guess they also hate that
2 Likes
Perhaps my previous statement was unclear. The core issue involves China, Thailand, and Japan. Ultimately, the Thai subtree is placed within the Japanese tech tree, and the fact remains that all these Thai vehicles participate in battles under Japan’s identity—this is an unchangeable aspect of the current game implementation.
They are added under Thailand flag
1 Like
Look, you’re trying to muddy the waters again. First of all, this is a geopolitical incident deliberately provoked by Gaijin, yet you are distorting the facts and blaming us Chinese players. If they didn’t want to stir up this issue, why didn’t they implement the Oplot-T flying the Ukrainian flag for the USSR in this version update? It’s because they are afraid of threats from the Russian side and don’t dare to do it.
3 Likes
Your statement is really funny. Did I ever say anything derogatory about VT4？As for which side do you stand on and what does it have to do with me?Our demand is simple, to fix the bugs in the vehicle
1 Like
But you cannot change the fact that the faction flag displayed in battle is the Japanese national flag, not Thailand’s own flag.
2 Likes
I almost forgot about this issue. If the VT-4 were assigned to Japan, there would certainly be a small number of extreme Japanese players who would use provocative decals or graffiti—such as those hinting at notorious wartime atrocities like Unit 731—to provoke others.How do you explain this?
2 Likes
Thanks, I hate it OxO
Now that I’ve explained all this, you should understand why I’ve always emphasized that the issue of where the Thai VT-4 belongs is not a minor one. Behind it still lie those historical and political problems that cannot be avoided.
Ok, stop trying to blamed other players. This kind of statement begin from the Chinese forum, is y’all start all of this including using geopoltics as reason. I believe most of the non PRC players simply don’t understand what you guys actually want to said, is it bug fixing of the vehicle or the Thai VT-4.
You gotta know a ongoing conflict is very difference to and historical issues, and you know what? Maybe you can ask your government’s opinion on this issues, I think they won’t also be okay with that. Long story short, Ukraine is on war with Russia and PRC is not on war with Japan, I believe if the Russo-Ukraine didn’t happened they will also added T-84 to USSR tree in this update.
Both situations involve political issues, so why are you applying double standards here? The game company should have been aware of these sensitivities and taken measures to avoid them before releasing such content. However, they clearly didn’t bother, likely because they see it as our problem, not theirs. And now you’re still making excuses for Gaijin’s actions? How laughable. What benefit did Gaijin even offer you to defend them like this?
3 Likes
Just like China players sticking all kind of decal on Japan tank I think it also allow Japan players sticking those thing on a Chinese tank
2 Likes