So are we in a topic regarding the balance of CAS or whole game issues?
You were the one who first pointed out to me about what we should talk here. You can’t just change the topic because the argument is not to Your liking.
1 Like
Why it shouldn’t be asked for? Players can ask for anything regardless the state game is.
Again removing air assets is easy.
Also lots of clips you shown is more about poor netcode and not only volumetric. I have tons of training missions for ground vehicles and that stuff just doesn’t happen locally, only over the internet.
2 Likes
Considering yall keep yapping about TO
I show why TO it will still be bad
Wont change the game,wont fix it,bugs and issues will still plague the game
Congratulation,i bet i will see you around other post crying about other issues as soon TO drops
(IF it drops,since it was legit denied)
But changing SPAA/raising SP costs of air weaponary won’t solve that either?
Sorry but there is no “one” solution to all problems, here we are talking about air balance in combined gamemode.
1 Like
You’re simply proving my point: Warthunder isn’t by any means realistic.
Buffing SPAA = Easier to contest
Raising SP cost per bomb/FaF missiles = less of a CAS spam which btw,in some games thats the only reason SPAA gets killed,cause 4 duded have to kill 10 planes strafing stuff from every direction
So yeah,to a degree,this is a step to properly balance CAS
The whole i listed its just 1 thing right?Dawg
But it doesn’t solve the issues with the game You have listed so by Your own logic that is not a good solution.
1 Like
Fixing is not easy and they should continue doing that. Its much more work to fix those issues than to just remove air assets and give players new game mode.
Your own words:
What You have proposed will result with the same
2 Likes
My logic seems to bend over to what the vast majority of the community its asking and what the game criticaly needs improvements
Like it or not
This:
So again, Your own logic doesn’t work with what You say.
TO is for fixing balance with CAS in GRB, not fixing the whole game.
2 Likes
Of course it will do as teams in combined mode are going to be more focused on combined aspect of the game, not on pure tank vs tank combat.
2 Likes
@Necronomica just close this thread already,feels useless speaking to the same 2 people who all they argue its a TO that has nothing to do with actual balancing the game
Take care yall,cya
I’m not a Forum Moderator. You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure).
Sorry but the solutions You want to implement won’t fix the issue, the are just going to make it appear less so the problem will still exist for people wanting just to play pure tank vs tank combat. As long as there are people like it, there is no easy “solution”.
2 Likes
I can tag ANY of them to close?
Probably, but as far as i know only the thread creator can ask to close their thread if it doesn’t break any rules.
Aight,ill give it a try anyway,this is getting absurd and keeps going out of topic
@anastasia001122 Can you forums mods actually close threads?
Please try to be civil, read again our forum guidelines:
https://forum.warthunder.com/guidelines
Your last 10 replies on this thread were profanities.
2 Likes
No need to ask for this thread to be closed. Instead, just continue to work on sharing evidence, proof, videos, stats etc…that CAS can be dealt with when certain vehicles are used correctly. To me that already balances out the CAS besides flying, but I don’t want to fly as much. Unfortunate not many learn to use them.
Ex: Latest match I just had. None got the chance to CAS at all. CAS free match.
I wish more players actually came up with ideas and talk about it as a whole but instead it’s overshadowed by TO bias and refuse any other suggestion lol
3 Likes