The developers of the game disagree with you.
primarily
primarily
primarily
There is an objective. You have a problem and are offered a solution through said objective. Somehow it’s still not enough for you for…reasons?
If the main objective of the game mode is not the focus of the game mode then the game mode has design issues.
Obv when both are applied, the timewasting overrides.
But simply flying outside of the main lemming vector is not timewasting.
I do not consider flying along the edge of the map border to be simply “flying outside of the lemming vector”.
He is alone against many, he would be a fool to fly straight in.
He stays out of detection and waits for the right time to strike, if not, wait for the enemy to come to you whilst you have some kind of advantage to exploit.
Your just salty mate, some proper Himalayan minerals.
Why make the post if you are just gonna argue with people or have a bad attitude?
Use your radar better or hit ground targets, nothing more to say.
I don’t think you understand rhetorical in this context, and that isn’t my problem. Much the same as you being unable to prioritize objectives when you have a problem with a players actions.
You’re talking about an F-111 with rockets that was base bombing then flew out over the bay.
Are you seriously asking the question of whether a player would be incentivized to do the task which rewards them more?
Not at all, I’m actually asking why you see it beneath you to go for those targets when they are part of the objective rather than fixating on the player you can’t get to merely lose by being distracted.
It shouldn’t matter about the reward, but the actual outcome of the match.
That is after all, one way of making the tickets bleed.
I don’t understand why you’re asking this as a rhetorical question.
Stop using words you don’t understand… It’s not making you any more engaging.
Why are you literally ignoring the WW2 era vehicles, that are soft, that can take tickets out, and instead complaining about a player whom you cannot get, but still won’t take out those targets because they don’t ‘reward’ you as much… It’s like you’re shooting yourself in the foot intentionally to spite someone.
1 Like
You’re asking an illogical question posed as a rhetorical question I’m trying to figure out why.
If you don’t understand why you’re doing this then it will probably be better if you stop asking the same question.
You’re actually avoiding the point as per usual, and trying to act smart in the interim…
I’ve rephrased that question a number of times, you’re just ignorant to it and want it to be the same to make it easier to keep moving them goalposts…
1 Like
I’ve been asking you to clarify your point. You are the one refusing to do so, not I.
I’m pretty sure that my point is crystal clear, but you choose to debate and try avoid it…
You even stated that the convoy was WW2 era vehicles with little reward, and I directly asked why you don’t go for them to cause the ticket bleed…
It shouldn’t matter if it doesn’t reward you with anything if it can win the match, but alas, the usual, gamemode must change to suit you mentality reigns supreme, and avoid the point as much as possible to continue the faux ‘engagement’…
It’s alright, it shows that you cannot have any sort of engagement if it doesn’t match your agenda, or ‘topic’.
Play the objective, it’ll work out better for you.
2 Likes
If there are no rewards for the action why is the player incentivized to take that action?
To win the damn match… Duh…
War Thunder has no SBMM.
What in the actual heck has that got to do with ANY of this?