Where?
1 Like
Takes almost 3 minutes, but a shot like this is possible.
You most likely wont ever hit at this range in-game, just like you most likely wont ever FIRE at that range.
short range pop up strikes are still the best, and GBU-39 lets you hit your target even if they arent exactly where you expect them to be
10x AIM-120s is stupidly OP for ground RB so it makes sense that’s high up.
Yep.
But it is quite amusing to let it sit in 14.0 in air games since it lacks hmd.
HMD is not a BR changing feature.
Someone failed to cite Mirage 2000D RMV, but that aircraft has a significantly lighter gunpod that increases its flight performance.
Honestly. For most nato nations, HMD is kinda a bit meh anyway at the moment, handy, but Aim-9M is useless off-boresight and the only nations that truly get their monies worth out of having HMD is anything with Magic II or R-73.
In the Typhoon I very very rarely fire an Aim-9M in any condition other than leading the shot. We wont get the full worth out of HMD until we get stuff like ASRAAM and IRIS-T
Even if It might be true, but still better than sending F-15E down to 12.3 because of Kh38, which OP want. :/
Especially when Tonka GR.4 is 12.3 and A-10C is on 12.0
The spec difference between A-10C and F-15E is big as hell, and it shouldn’t be 0.3BR higher.
I should’ve used the image of the A-10C instead of the Finnish F-18C, which is finished.
I get plenty of use out of western HMD right now…
1 Like
They added KH-38MTs to strike eagle?
I use the HMD for the AIM-120 very often. And in my opinion, all top aircraft could get an HMD.
Yes, yes… I really want to insult you. Read the entire post I’m talking about the plane and not the weapon.
As I said, if the weapon matters then the Ki-48-II otsu should be at a higher battle rating, no?
Where’d they say that?
2 Likes
Clearly should be the same BR as the SK80 for having MACLOS
Wait, you want to say that weapons aviable to any vehicle dont matter when considering its BR or capability?
In this thread: People complain about a vehicle being rated by its FM alone but not its weapons, and another group complains about comparing weapons without considering FM.
Both sides too stubborn to admit all judgement is based on a vehicles overall characteristics as a sum of all its parts?
1 Like
Not F15E, but only AGM65s, it is 100% overvalued, it is much worse than AASM or KH38, and this is the reason why F15E could be able to lower BR when compared to SU30SM or SU34.
think about SU25SM3 and Mirage 2000 RMV, don’t you think they should be lower BR at GRB as well, they don’t even have ability to BVR
Only if new SPAA is added to deal with AGM-65 carriers.
Hopefully China gets the 18km version of their SPAA next major for that exact situation, finally balancing AGM-65 carriers and potentially Hammer and Kh-38MT carriers at the same time.
All that’ll be left will be the long-range laser munitions.
The Su-25 SMT has these fictitious KH-38MT missiles, that’s why it’s such an IR. But I agree it’s a bit high.
You really like to joke here.
@Demokrat4 coming in to defend his precious Kh-38MTs, Hammers, and AGM-65Ds cause I called them OP.
He’ll tell us how he fragged maneuvering Kh-38MT and AGM-65D carriers from 18km using an ADATS. ;)
CAS is OP no matter how many times you call everyone names.