I propose to reduce the combat rating of the F-15E to 12.3.
The reason is that its armament is too weak.
Let’s take the main AGM-65D missiles as an example. In all performance characteristics, these missiles are inferior to top missiles, for example, the KH-38MT. Mavericks are literally three times worse than the KH-38MT.
Just for comparison.
AGM-65D Maverick
Kh-38MT
Speed.
AGM-65D 0.9 Mach.
Kh-38MT 2.2 Mach.
Mass of explosives
AGM-65D 57 kg.
Kh-38MT 152 kg.
Range
AGM-65D 27 km
Kh-38MT 40 km
Guidance
AGM-65D IIR.
Kh-38MT IIR + inertial.
AGM-65D is the worst missile at 12.7.
Reason for the decrease, F-15E will play less often with top aircraft at 13.0.
I know that at 13.0 if there are other nations with other aircraft, the same Rafael, but in all performance characteristics AGM-65D is the oldest and worst missile at this BR.
5 Likes
Nein
I propose decompression in every single BR bracket, fixing all vehicle bugs, inaccuracy and overall wrong presentation of the vehicle, game mechanic inaccuracy and bugs, general ingame balance across all nations, remove or do proper balance on non-existence weaponry/vehicle
25 Likes
F-15E, the Striker Eagle at lower battle rating? This is the best close air support airplane in-game.
Comparing two distinct weapons isn’t comparing an airplane.
18 Likes
hes kinda right
but this is Gaijin fault anyway
F-15E is also slightly behind Su30/34 capability
2 Likes
An airplane is just a weapon carrier, like a tank or an infantry fighting vehicle. Yes, the aircraft’s performance characteristics are important, but its weapons are even more important.
Wait what? I don’t understand, the plane are just a weapon carrier but the plane also matters but at the same time it’s more important the weapon?
Ok then, so I think it’s fair Ki-48-II otsu to a proper battle rating, maybe battle rating 7.7 as it has a massive air-to-ground missile only at battle rating 2.3.
1 Like
Why are you comparing a HEAT warhead AGM with an HE warhead one? I know why. It’s the same reason you make baseless statements like “Mavericks are literally three times worse than the KH-38MT.”
1 Like
it is tho…
its right there on stat card n ingame spec
its right there…
1 Like
NO
KH-38MT carriers should go up. the F-15E SHOULD NOT GO DOWN
3 Likes
Bruh su30 and su34 are much better
1 Like
Because G only has 2 missiles and they take up space from 6 AGM-65D.
1 Like
I probably didn’t express myself correctly. I wanted to say that if you take away the KH-38MT from the SU-34, this aircraft will become less useful. And if, say, you take away the AIM-120 from the F-15S, it will cease to be useful at all. So I wanted to say that it’s not really about the aircraft, but about its armament. Although the aircraft’s performance characteristics are also important.
You played 11.7 ground for s nation that isnt USA rn?.
A full uptier you still see the f15s you do not see su30s and 34s rafale etc.
Arguably the f15 E/I should move up in Br as they doninate the bracket.
T
2 Likes
See Yak9K, with the 3.0 Yak9 body + much heavier 45mm, is still considered as a strong point and click cas at 4.7
The Ki48 with Ki148 however, if you give it a proper IR seeker, would have 0 reason not to be at 10.3-11.0 GRB br.
A SACLOS/ Laser without a scope can easily make it 9.3-10.0
But MCLOS, nah not a weapon for anyone else than the few manual pros
I mean sure, the 65Ds aren’t as good as the Kh38s, but what you are proposing is to just make the TT GRB CAS problem even worse by giving the US special treatment.
7 Likes
Why not? Russia has a special SPPA and the US will have a special CAS.
1 Like
lolno
It’s a meta CAS platform and should go to 13.0.
People lacking skill to use these OP platforms is not an excuse.
5 Likes
It should have gone to 13.0 with the rest. The fact it’s still only 12.7 is kinda BS.
Also 12.3 would place it at the same BR as the Tornado Gr4 and the F15E is substantially more capable
7 Likes