I propose to lower the combat rating for the F-15E in Ground realistic battles

hes kinda right
but this is Gaijin fault anyway
F-15E is also slightly behind Su30/34 capability

2 Likes

An airplane is just a weapon carrier, like a tank or an infantry fighting vehicle. Yes, the aircraft’s performance characteristics are important, but its weapons are even more important.

Wait what? I don’t understand, the plane are just a weapon carrier but the plane also matters but at the same time it’s more important the weapon?

Ok then, so I think it’s fair Ki-48-II otsu to a proper battle rating, maybe battle rating 7.7 as it has a massive air-to-ground missile only at battle rating 2.3.

1 Like

Why are you comparing a HEAT warhead AGM with an HE warhead one? I know why. It’s the same reason you make baseless statements like “Mavericks are literally three times worse than the KH-38MT.”

1 Like

it is tho…
its right there on stat card n ingame spec
its right there…

1 Like

NO

KH-38MT carriers should go up. the F-15E SHOULD NOT GO DOWN

3 Likes

so decompression

3 Likes

ye

1 Like

Bruh su30 and su34 are much better

1 Like

image
Because G only has 2 missiles and they take up space from 6 AGM-65D.

1 Like

I probably didn’t express myself correctly. I wanted to say that if you take away the KH-38MT from the SU-34, this aircraft will become less useful. And if, say, you take away the AIM-120 from the F-15S, it will cease to be useful at all. So I wanted to say that it’s not really about the aircraft, but about its armament. Although the aircraft’s performance characteristics are also important.

You played 11.7 ground for s nation that isnt USA rn?.
A full uptier you still see the f15s you do not see su30s and 34s rafale etc.

Arguably the f15 E/I should move up in Br as they doninate the bracket.

T

2 Likes

See Yak9K, with the 3.0 Yak9 body + much heavier 45mm, is still considered as a strong point and click cas at 4.7

The Ki48 with Ki148 however, if you give it a proper IR seeker, would have 0 reason not to be at 10.3-11.0 GRB br.

A SACLOS/ Laser without a scope can easily make it 9.3-10.0

But MCLOS, nah not a weapon for anyone else than the few manual pros

IMG_1489

I mean sure, the 65Ds aren’t as good as the Kh38s, but what you are proposing is to just make the TT GRB CAS problem even worse by giving the US special treatment.

7 Likes

Why not? Russia has a special SPPA and the US will have a special CAS.

1 Like

lolno
It’s a meta CAS platform and should go to 13.0.
People lacking skill to use these OP platforms is not an excuse.

5 Likes

It should have gone to 13.0 with the rest. The fact it’s still only 12.7 is kinda BS.

Also 12.3 would place it at the same BR as the Tornado Gr4 and the F15E is substantially more capable

7 Likes

So your plan for fixing the CAS imbalance is leaving the SU30/34 alone, and nuking the next lower bracket with the F15E …

And yes , while mavericks are inferior, they arent your only armament on the F15E.

SU-30/34 can , at most , take 6 KH38 and a few AAMs.

The F15E , along with 6 AGM-65D and AIM-120 can also take:
~ 20(?) GBU-38
5 2000LB JDAMs
Or the assorted Laser equivalents of 500LB and 2000LB bombs.

5 Likes

We somehow learned to fight with Pantsir and Su-30 and Su-34, so let them learn on 11.3. Skill issue.

So, by that logic. I had to deal with Pantsirs in the Tornado Gr1 and not the F-16 the US had, therefore lower the Tornado GR1 to 10.7

1 Like