not, it should get all 4 just like hornet
and later strike/all advanced eagles have 360 internal, and with the US advanced eagles they should be able to carry BOL on the outer pylons for a total of 8 BOL
and…
This is probably why.
You want 1600 CMs on the F-15 that is already doing jsut fine with what it already has?
1 Like
does tornado really need 1576 countermeasures (the vast majority of which are large caliber)
- Most of those are chaff-only not mixed
- Its a Tornado IDS, what is already considered a reasonably weak 11.3 aircraft. At 12.3. Its carried by its CM count, it has nearly nothing else going for it
- its a strike aircraft not a top tier fighter.
1 Like
well ingame so is the strike eagle
Last time I checked, the F-15E wasnt limited to 2x Aim-9Ms and spent most matches base bombing
They’re American players, they would base bomb
1 Like
damn i was gonna say something like that
1 Like
i mean even then the later F-15’s with these numbers of countermeasures (current ones can only do a measly 880 with BOL) are facing a whole different level of threat
You can flag this if you want but pls?
Spoiler
1 Like
Wrong, all the 15C does is that pulls harder and rates better up until around 550 kph, after that it stays on the losing side.
Both actually
Both are boats, and the su33 is probably the 2nd worst flanker variant in terms of dogfight performance with the firsy being the su34.
1 Like
Hmm, I do see a load of GBU39s in the sky. I wonder who is the perpetrator.
Whilst yes they don’t have to ‘bomb’ they still do. And yes I agree with u otherwise.
and i have shot down a F-18C with a I-15 in a 1v1 dogfight before, does that mean the I-15 is a better dogfighter than the F-18?
1 Like
And they are threats BOL aren’t gonna help with. It’s ECM that should do the job in newer generation air combat.
Flares still work. And chaff maybe less effective but in combination with EW could work better
Wrong. Especially because taking the TGP immediatelyahistorically halves the CM load
1 Like
You realise the mans talking about dogfighting and being hit by an R73.
Im not talking about iwth its ground loadout at this point.
However agai 60Cms is still sufficient , but barely.
Gotta ask, why tf does it half the CM load? im about half way down the TT for the F15E, had to start at 2.3 -.- is it even worth the bother the way folks here are going on about it?
it is
Which still happens in ground matches.
And in ASB I take a TGP to improve render distance, when it doesn’t do stupid crap like that.
Because the Devs are pathetically incompetent or willfully negligent, and can’t read the plain English in 2 editions of the manuals available that state the limitation is 1.) only for flares 2.) only for the outboard blocks and 1 row of the inboard blocks 3.) only applies to the LANTIRN pod, and neither of the more modern TGP options it frankly should have access to in-game which would completely remove any restrictions to begin with.
Yes, it’s still worth it. It just has had the usual "it’s not Russian so the devs have made “‘certain choices’” in how it’s implemented that negatively affect it.
It is a fraction of its correctly implemented capability