I never understood why there is no All Vehicle Big Battle Mode

[FlyingDoctor]

@Zephoid

Are you dense?

No, and that’s where the ‘conversation’ ends.

I’ll not have you make out that me having different views on tactics and actual differing playstyles as being ‘dense’.

And as per usual, ULQ in here backing you up as I mentioned before.

This absurd ‘You don’t agree with me so you must be wrong’ is idiotic.

@Pacifica @Forum Moderators I’m TIRED of this genuine bad faith arguing and beration.

This isn’t discussion, it’s dictation and dogpiling without any actual basis.

@Herojure24

And yet we were talking about SPAA being outranged and not being able to kill planes anyother way than with another plane.

And you aren’t outranged in the example that was given when I said about it not being outranged.

Stop gatekeeping and barricading discussion, and just arguing to try and make someone bow down and submit… NONE of this is “DISCUSSION”.

[Herojure24]

And which example would that be exactly?

[FlyingDoctor]

Convieniently a thread that I engaged with in the past week, has been deleted, and it’s mainstay was that you couldn’t range a Pe8 or a Lanc with WW2 era vehicles, which is gone.

Doesn’t matter, my stance and statement still stands, and with the implementation of the new SPAA on the next update, that’ll make a different outcome, won’t it?

Who are we kidding, there’ll be players still complaining and making these statements about air being the only option because that’s all they find works.

[Zephoid]

Oh please, you start out ’ how does a pilot taking a 120mm to the chest have to do with SPAA’ as if you can’t draw parallels. Then you get indignant when you get called out on said willfull ignorance. ‘without any actual basis’? Seriously? You are the one who started the discussion with ‘well we know whan you say is not true because SB’… LIke SB flying is like RB flying. You start with bad assumptions, throw out only situational argument, make bad conclusions, feign ignorance, then when you are called out you cry.

I disagree with most of what ULQ posts, so stop trying to make it out like you are the victim of something.

Discussions about bad ideas often end up with them being called… bad ideas. That you can’t understand that everyone criticizing the idea is a sign of that is on you. That IS the discussion, no matter if it goes the way you want or not.

[Pecanin]

WT Engine should be taken outside and executed NKVD style …it couldn’t handle 10 % of what would be needed for combined battles.

[FlyingDoctor]

@Zephoid

Oh please, you start out ’ how does a pilot taking a 120mm to the chest have to do with SPAA’ as if you can’t draw parallels.

Because it doesn’t matter… You’re comparing them being shot with your SPG with an SPAA to be absurd and mock.

@Zephoid

Then you get indignant when you get called out on said willfull ignorance. ‘without any actual basis’? Seriously?

“Willful ignorance” give me a break.

@Zephoid

You are the one who started the discussion with ‘well we know whan you say is not true because SB’…

@Zephoid

LIke SB flying is like RB flying.

@Zephoid

You start with bad assumptions, throw out only situational argument, make bad conclusions, feign ignorance, then when you are called out you cry.

You’re totally mistaken if you think I said anything about SB at all.

@Zephoid

I disagree with most of what ULQ posts, so stop trying to make it out like you are the victim of something.

It’s the fact that the mentioning of it, and the mantra it pushes, is what feeds the disdain.

@Zephoid

Discussions about bad ideas often end up with them being called… bad ideas.

They can, but that’s not after actual discussion.

@Zephoid

That you can’t understand that everyone criticizing the idea is a sign of that is on you.

That you can’t actually track what’s said is of concern seeing as you are that wound up to ‘debate’…

@Zephoid

That IS the discussion, no matter if it goes the way you want or not.

Within 3 minutes, the lurker ULQ has already liked your misguided attack.

Wonderful.

[FlyingDoctor]

@FlyingDoctor

The point I make is a common one I make a lot, and receive ignorant flak for due to it not aligning with this ‘I may as well roll over and die’ mentality that comes from the ‘masses’ here.

Quoting this because it applies… Stop being so uptight guys.

[ULQ_LOVER]

Can’t wait for a new version of WWM, probably is going to be much better than the old ones.

Sadly probably it is going to be again only good for squadrons consisting of best players to win the whole mode, but I hope normal players are going to enjoy it too!

[Herojure24]

If the new spaa actually have the range it might be better but I would not know since France is not gettin one this update.

[FlyingDoctor]

It’s the thing, it’s an effort, and an attempt at making something better.

There’s others to be added, as well as other roles, but the larger concept of radar over all, but this multi-vehicle/data linking is really going to be promising.

Very keen to see the development possibilities from even having this sort of thing brought in, along with the possibility in the future of having target lazing directly implemented.