The one that should be created.
The Swedish have pictures of testing the Tiger II, the Ho-Ri wasn’t completed however there are pictures of how early it was in which testing the gun trials and the hull was being produced for the Chi-Ri and a wooden mockup. The Ho-Ri production isn’t far-fetched from what the original design would have looked like. Especially when you consider that prototypes and their production versions always look different from one another.
2, your statement that the separation would benefit SPAA is laughable because your message has not at all mentioned how it would benefit SPAA. Which in the name is “Self Propelled Anti Air” The word there and I’ll write it in caps is ANTI-AIR, not Anti Tank, not Anti boat, ANTI-AIR.
3: Combined arms as a definition and I quote " Combined arms is an approach to warfare that seeks to integrate different combat arms of a military to achieve mutually complementary effects". Refers to different combat arms including class/role types. Infantry and Armor is only one type of Combined Arms. The word is not directed by just this form. Ex: Light Armor supports medium and Heavies as they can be utilized in a more flexible method of flanking, producing repair assistance, etc.
Tank Destroyers have the means to provide heavy assistance either within the Support Role or not.
However, each category has its subcategory. Ex: Ho-NI I and III were irl Artillery pieces while they were equipped with anti-tank shells, it was advised to not engage in direct combat. That was not the intended role of any of the Ho-NI Platforms which is what the name refers to.
To put it simply if you are going to make a post it better not be an R post about removing planes from GRB, separation of the game modes. Etc as often you are just going to tick all of us who can knock you down a few screws.
1 Like
When did The Tiger 2 appear in Swedish service?
I remember too when Japan used wooden tanks to defend their country.
Except I did.
This isn’t real life. The game isn’t realistic in the slightest.
Try proper english next time I have no idea what you’re trying to say here.
Do we not already have a mixed system? Is that not the purpose of the “Mixed Battles” matchmaker that is GRB and GSB?
When did the Chi-To, Type-3 Chi-Nu, Ho-Ni III, Type-3 Ka-Chi, Zerstörer 45, Oswind II, German La-5FN, P-47D, Tempest Mk V,*Me 262A1a/U1, Ho-229 See service? You can try to argue “historical accuracy” and I’ll use your nation to make my point clear.
At this point, I don’t know what he’s trying to argue. On one hand, his title says separating the game modes but everything he is writing is either related to ->Remove planes, then and now about the historical accuracy something the devs have stated were never going to happen the way many thing it would.
1 Like
it is already fair, compared to effort must been made. but reward for killing from planes must be increased, it is really low compared to others
In other threads he can’t seem to talk straight as well
Correction: on SOME matches you will experience that, on others there will be no aircraft and all SPAA are useless.
Brutally aware. Spading the Imp Chapparal has been an interesting endeavor since it cannot engage helicopters very well. I’ve found that using SPAA as a second spawn can help eliminate enemy aircraft for mid game and allows farming of SP for late game activities.
Plays GROUND battles, looks inside: planes.
2 Likes
What br will the ozelot be in this tank only mode?
Or the flakrad too
Must not have read the game’s description well did you?
1 Like
Cool, but when the gamemode I’m playing is called “ground battles” and not “combined battles,” it is still a valid point.
2 Likes
Not really. The website describes the game as combined battles. It isn’t my fault that you didn’t look into what the game entailed before you started.
False advertising is a thing lol
When you buy an item online or look at one, what do you look at first? The Title, then the description to learn the details of the title.
Not at all, the game is as described when they say it is combined battles.
But what of the “ground battles” gamemode? It has nothing to do with aerial vehicles then?
Because a “combined battles” gamemode would follow that description
Ground battles describes the primary vehicle used, not the only vehicle used. Again, the entire game is based around combined arms, as described on the website. It would be hard to pick the right mode if it was combined battles, air battles, and combined battles so ground battles, air battles, and naval battles helps players pick the right mode.