That’s goofy. Radar SPAA players already dont need to aim, why would they need an ahistorical accuracy buff?
Aaaand here it is. The I don’t wanna play CAS so others shouldn’t be allowed to cope.
What is the historical tracking accuracy for systems like that? The current modeling doesn’t feel accurate, but I could be wrong. Do you have sources regarding the accuracy of systems like the Gepard?
Two nations get new spaa to counter the growin CAS danger.
And one of them won’t have enough range to do their job
Sweden don’t have decent spaa unless Gaijin decide to give them Patriot system but how to put the radar seperate into battle is for discussion again.
Yeah, a terrible Swedish SPAA and a Chinese ADATS. At least the Chinese ADATS will be good, the Swedish thing is a Type 81
The Swedish spaa is small and with bushes it can still be hidden from CAS and the launching system is the same like Tor which make it usefull to fire from urban area without getting caught in the open area.
Have you played the Tor or HQ? Nothing says amazing SPAA like having your missile being cold at close range, and having the most obvious and slow missile in the entire game. At least the OTOMATIC can kinda deal with close targets.
I don’t have reach the top Chinese tier yet but it depend how you play the spaa is not like playing the Pantsir. You compare cannon vs missiles are totall different style.
I have both Tor and HQ-17, and I can tell you it’s not the best SPAA, it’s not even top three. The only thing it’s better than is the Imp and OTOMATIC.
It’s better than nothing though too, and using them is better than just doing nothing.
Even the mere risk of you being on the field, is a deterent.
They absolutely need to add more SPAA variants.
Imagine how much of a risk there would be for an enemy if he was using the air ;)
1 Like
Top spaa is still the pantsir but here is clip that you can kill verhicles with the missile if CAS not available.
Being in the combined mode is not a burden to anyone–it’s what RB GFs is all about, per its description.
Also, there is no such thing as “CAS players”…the closest we have is “tankers who fly.” Those are people simply playing the mode in its entirety and you really have no place to deride them for truly playing WT in whole.
RB GFs already focuses on GFs…GFs are the vehicles with the clout, via the objectives.
Also, decades newer RSPAAs facing 1940s/50s aircraft (which don’t even have all their weaponry) is a balance issue. RSPAAs do have an undue advantage as-is and at some point that will have to be reined in as a matter of balancing.
Current data leaves that unclear, because RB GFs is a shared mode between AF/GFs. The data is not filtered enough to definitively determine what you are claiming here.
Based upon how prevalent people such as yourself claim aircraft are, it appears very possible aircraft have at least comparable playtime, if not an advantage.
Until we have more data, your claim cannot be substantiated.
2 Likes
- Not all AA have them
- Of course there is always a dead body available nearby, and the missile will, as we know, always switch track
- What do you even want to answer to that, it makes 0 sense
ha yes, yes, and we can add Hawk and every sort of soviet SAMs from the 50s-60s, same era after all, let’s see how balanced that is.
And planes shouldn’t pull 14G, nor should they see outside of cockpit view, yet here we are
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Okay, until you have actually played it, you have zero say in the Tor, okay? Good, glad we got that covered.
Every second played as SPAA is one second less played with MBT that can actually win the battles. Be usefull, play the objective
Dude, if you rely on being in a plane to get eliminations, just say that. Imagine playing GROUND battles, and then hiding in the sky, like dude, we have a mode for air. Play that.
2 Likes
Date of introduction was never a thing they balance vehicles on, it’s their ability to perform.
3 Likes