I just read all your messages in this post and I still need to see some kind of actual information and not just words from you. Show me a video or some conclusive evidence to back up the nonsense you are defending.
Inb4 this gets blocked
1 Like
Want to hop on in to the game and test it on a custom?
2 Likes
No I don’t want to hop on in to the game at the moment.
Dude doesn’t even have the 27SM, let alone 30SM and he’s coping about it
Keep using StatShark to “prove” your point.
I don’t see how they are coping.
The R-77-1s theoretical BVR performance is better, but it will never be as good practically due to a worse BVR platform, and high drag when manoeuvring.
I really don’t think this is that deep, or that complex of a situation.
3 Likes
He hasn´t played the plane that has the R-77-1 yet he is saying it is bad?
1 Like
I am offering you a first class source that the R-77-1 is better than the AIM-120
So your main piece of evidence here is a graph from SS.
Which makes me believe you’re either spreading misinformation on purpose or have absolutely no idea how the game and SS itself work.
1 Like
We are talking about the missile it self here, not the plataform, but even then the R-77-1 is on par with the AIM-120
Again, want to hop in to a custom so i can show you the performance of the R-77-1 compared to an AIM-120? Otherwise makes me believe you’re either spreading misinformation on purpose or have absolutely no idea how the game and SS itself work.
Not talking about platforms when discussing BVR missile performance is deceitful, missiles aren’t spawning in the air on their own.
It is on par overall imo, but the 120 is better at BVR.
One is better WVR, the other is better BVR.
1 Like
I’m actually telling you how these things work.
First error happened when you launched both with same launch parameters.
Second error is when you took the time to the target as a decisive value, which is only valid for a fully AFK target with the first error already mixed in.
Okay, then lets say a R-77-1 is fired at 1200km/h at 10k of alt and at the same time, an AIM-120 is fired at 1700km/h at the same alt at a target 60km away, the R-77-1 will reach the target in 51.6, and the AIM-120 will reach the target in 50.4 seconds.
Now you may say “muhhhh but drag, it can be outrunned, it can be notched” and so on; any missile that is not being fired directly in your face will be notcheable and outrunnable, (so same argument applies for the 120), it doesnt matter wich one is it, maybe not with the mica in the notch since it got a small buff this update.
Now at close range, lets say at 10km (bc further away will be extra easy to evade), the 77-1 will be able to turn in time while still burning, being way better and faster than the 120
Edit: AIM-120 will reach a speed of M4.14 and the R-77-1 M4.44
3 Likes
Just shoot down any incoming AMRAAMs. You have 12 R-77-1s the most that can be fired at you from a single aircraft is 8 from an F-15C/E :P
3 Likes
Look in my eyes. Said the velocity gate.
Assuming R-77-1 can even reach a target 20km away without wobbling itself out of the air. lol. LMAO even.
1 Like
You have 0 experience with FOX-3, get the Su-30SM and then come back to this post after trying the R-77-1
1 Like