Preferably just list them in order in a comment, you can pick the top 3 in the poll.
I wonder why its screwed up when i send it
Leo 2A7/Strv 122
Abrams
Merkava Mk.4
Leclerc
Leo 2A5/6/PSO
CR2E
Type 10/TKX
Ariete AMV
T-80BVM
ZTZ99A/WZ1001
CR2BN (Pre Engine Buff)
T-90M
VT4/A1
T-72B3A
I rank them like this
2A7/A7HU
122B/B+: they are below the 2A7 since those got better thermal and im blind af
Abrums: Abrums
Type 10/ TKX: Yea the 4s reload and such is nice but for some reason it feel so sluggish to play
T80BVM
Merk
Leclerc
Ariete
VT4
ZTZ99
T90M: Look nice i guess
My top tier mbt list is the following
Ranking the WZ lowest is actual madness
Putting ZTZ and WZ in the same spot is like putting leo 2a5 and 2a6 in the same,
The WZ has a superior gun, a high caliber MG on the roof on top of the ZTZ armor
Im curious as to why you rank leclerc much higher than type 10; as well as BVM below both ariete and challly2E. Also why is merkava so high on the list?
Gaijin needs to fix all the Chinese tanks they are severely poorly implemented Many lack realistic reloading and their spall liners are also missing
Gaijin should implement more of its own Chinese vehicles, such as the ZTZ-100 or the ZTD-05
Yeah,VT4 is way worse. But atm on top tier WZ/ZTZ both have only their superior mobility, all while having subpar armor and longest reload. But their mobility is unmatched.
There armor is actually really good ngl, you have a big lowerplate but nothing a few bushes can´ t fix.
But the upper front plate basically cant get penned… But then you have tanks like the leo 2a6/5/pso and leclerc and challys with the same weakspots + a weaker upper front plate.
The reload sucks ass ngl but i still prefer it over something like a chally or leo.
As the chally only has 3 rounds in the ready rack and the nato tanks just have a long ass reload the moment you take the loader…
its called black night not knight btw
Thanks for letting me know, I’ve already fixed it
Chinese tanks are actually really good,
Fair enough, though i thought the shell was actually not that great, way worse at top tier, but also way better available too, with that longer reload left them a bit lacking in firepower.
Its just better then 3BM60 lol 11mm less pen but faster, and u don’t even have less pen with the WZ gun as it is longer
The long reload sucks but i rather have a long constant one then suddenly half a year reload when my loader dies or ready rack is empty
Leclerc ratios Type 10 in all categories but “armor” and reload speed (both don’t have much armor anyway).
Type 10 has pitiful gun handling, acceleration, turning, etc.
Type 10 sacrifices far too much for that reload while something like the Leclerc has more of a balance.
Merkava Mk.4s have always been underrated. On paper they look like garbage, but the tank is actually heavily used in competitive gameplay and very good in random battles as well. Its very survivable and tanky, has a ton of utility in the ESS up front, 1 billion smokes, SAPHE-VT shell, -64 km/h, APS, LWS, etc. 5s reload and M322 doesn’t disappoint either.
Does it really make much of a difference? In practice the 2A5 and 2A6 are pretty much identical.
Fair enough.
Is it? Never seen it as issue, whenever I meet it in battle it doesnt trigger any alarms (at least no more than any other tank).
Does ESS provide any utility at top tier whatsoever when everyone has access to thermals or IR guidance nowadays? I struggle to come up with a case use that would justify it as advantage.