Only the spall lined leopards are an issue the T series tanks are incredibly easy to kill the T-90M especially its a oneshot 100% of the time not 99% like the BVM.
Reload is one of the most important factors at hightier, disregarding it shows how inexperienced you are.
No lol you really cant just aim centre mass and pray for a oneshot the abrams has arguably the highest survivability out of any of the high tier MBT i constantly have my blowout panels and spaced crew save me from dying, usually if i can get hull down im practically unkillable the most that will happen is my gun gets shot out.
You dont have to play the awful CQC maps just alt F4 you dont get crewlocked as long as you aren’t loaded into a game
Again maybe play the actual game before commenting on something like this which just proves how you dont know a single thing you’re talking about.
I advise everyone to not take anything SpeclistMain says with any weight or value he doesn’t own a single ground vehicle above 8.0 he has no idea what he’s talking about its probably all just ragebait
Considering the fact that the FIM-92 would potentially be getting revised, its still going to perform the same relative to a number of other SAMs so is less likely to be adjusted.
and having to wait for a break in the target firing to prevent the missile from being seduced by rockets & missile exhaust is incredibly frustrating on top of the ridiculously short range (~3km / 1.75km / .63km depending on the target class being; Jet / Helicopter / Drone) of the system.
Nothing stops an American playing an M1 in a USA team from coming top with 10 kills on a battle they lost.Many players dont care about the team or winning the battle but they stomp with American Tanks and planes. Win rate would not reflect this would it? You are talking teams not tanks.
I don’t know how you feel this confident in publically stating such bad points (the vast majority of them) when you have a merely 2000 total battles to back them up.
Sepv2 is overall on par with the bvm, both have their advantages of course.
You and many others who keep parroting this same bs over and over still to this day fail to prove that it has said stuff.
Ask them to add a whole new tank then, this isn’t a fix that could be applied to current tech tree abrams’
I’m gonna guess and say without looking in your stats that you have used neither of those missiles.
He doesn’t own a single tank above 8.0 nor a plane higher than 10.3 i dont know why he keeps posting about high tier vehicles he’s quite literally never even seen
Its funny he kept trying to lecture me on why the abrams was bad a few weeks ago and thats when i checked his stats and all he owns in mid tier italian tanks and american high tier jets
Why would they add a whole new tank when it’s only relative to the tanks that already exist? So then if it does get added we can listen to you people talk about how there’s too many abrams and other tanks need more attention, ad Infinitum? It would be easier to add to preexisting Vic’s. You know your way would just create another problem you all would be all too happy to bitch about
There are countless bug reports that are HEAVY with analysis for the ZTZ99A and have sat there for almost a year (some of them), we’re in the same boat sadly.
Lmao, the survivability of the Abrams pretty much stops existing after the 10.3 one. Also why would I need to pray for a oneshot? It pretty much happens 75% of the time when I aim for the turret ring.
The Abrams is the most survivable non-spall liner MBT at top tier, but it’s so incredibly easy to one shot that this isn’t a high bar.
I would say the SEPv1 is on par with the BVM, the SEPv2 is worse than both.
What do spall liners have to do with raw penetration?
The only thing that would have changed with a reload one second slower is that you probably would not have been able to get the second kill, although the guy wasn’t paying attention to you at all.
Oh wow, if you are at an incredibly high angle so none of the shots hit anything important (like in 99% of scenarios), it appears like you have high survivability! /s
Ah yes, because spending several minutes waiting for your computer to boot up again is a viable way to play a video game.
And how does this video prove that a single radio fuse HE is better than a viable top tier SPAA or light tank with tracking?
When someone who only has 8.0 vehicles has better opinions than you, you really need to reevaluate your stances.
Being fat and slow? while fighting against superior and more armored tanks than you? or the side armor that’s supposed to protect from any incomming AGM doesn’t do its purpose correctly? while the BVM having good mobility, low profile, unpenetrable hull, and the best side armor eating shells.
Another delusional statement with no experience in the Abrams whatsoever, how am i not surprised.
We already have multiple sources stating D.U was in every single Abrams made after 1998, and D.U started being put onto Abrams after 1988, There’s a D.U Hull and turreted M1 Abrams. At this point any of these Russian east Europeans who keep saying stupid shit like " the Abrams has no spall liner, or have no D.U hull just ignore them. Gaijin stona smin and the rest of this games incompetents Russian bias tam are nothing short but liars, they won’t acknowledge anything we’ve posted stona won’t ever answer questions in DMs smin just sits around saying useless stuff as if we’re all stupid and don’t notice the numerous contradictions he’s said over the years. Outright saying the reason that there is no AGM Lima is because it ignores smoke, meanwhile you have the KH Missile literally ignoring smoke, that Russian tank destroyed firing missiles using radar to fire through smoke.
Then you have SUs with ecm pods, meanwhile no other nation has them? There is no point in playing 11.7 u.s tanks. You are just playing an Uphill battle 10.3 is the maximum cut-off line. Anything else is a waste of time and sanity.
