Hornets BR. It's too much, Gaijin

Is NO ONE going to talk about how the current top BR should be 15.7? Seriously, don’t force phantoms with DF sparrows to fight f-18s, that’s player cruelty.
We NEED 15.7 now. f16A’s should NEVER see 4th gen jets. f15As should be in their own bracket and not see rafales or euros, that’s just so incredibly unfair. we NEED BR decompression, not more compression

3 Likes

Bullcrap! 14.0 was MANDATORY. or are you talking ground decompression?

“Maximum speed doesn’t win matchs, survivability does”
coughs in 60 countermeasures

L2P,… not unflareable.

Really comparing an overextended platform from a country that had no money for anything else?

You know you’re abusing, your demands aren’t even remotly acceptable,…

F/A-18A and C(early) have somewhat far better abilities of flight than Mirage F.1 you first compared.

Without even entering fact that 10 missiles is no where near 5 maximum of Mirage F.1

And the fact that avionics are from a whole different level.

Lets not forget that 60 on the hornet actually means 30 drops, its less than half of what the jf17 gets with its high calibre CMs

1 Like

Fixed

I think that 60CM on the hornet seems not final.

F-111F were armed with 52 CM just like F-111A did when it was on Dev Server.

60 on A model might be quite final, if gaijin wont give it BOL flares
But C model should have 120.

2 Likes

60CM on F/A-18A seems fine as long as there are quite much of jets which also have 60CM only, or even fewer than 60, at BR radius of F/A-18A.

  • F-16A/ADF/AJ (60CM) [12.3-12.7]
  • F-20A (30CM + 15LCM / 45 total) [12.7]
  • F-14A Early (60CM) [12.7]
  • MiG-29A (60CM) [12.7]
  • Yak-141 (60CM) [12.7]
  • MiG-21 Bison (60 LCM) [12.3]
  • Mirage 2000CS-4 (18CM + 16 LCM / 34 total) [12.3]

Agreed.
Just want to point out that “JF-17 better than F/A-18C Late bc JF-17 has 64 while 18C has 60” claims sounds a bit strange as long as Dev materials are not final.

@HighRiskNoReward
120 countermeasures, not 60.

Well, we all know that it is now has '60’CM currently thanks to copy-pasted placeholder.
Just for placeholder.

And we also know that it will get fixed to 120CM before updates
Right?
Because Dev materials are not final.

Unless some strange shit like F-16A MLU case happens. :/
(modelled as 90CM but having 60CM currently.)

I don’t think it’s a problem. None of the aircraft I listed are remotely undertiered or overpowered for their position, and the 18A is going to be the same BR as the Pantsir with two Walleyes that don’t track outside 3km. What is the mentality problem you’re referring to?

1 Like

I mean they are a russian main, so of course they would want more easy kills for the Pantsir at 12.0.

The only easy kill a Pantsir will get is someone flying straight. Seeing as how there’s a premium F-18, yes that would be the case

They were talking about the 18A though, which only has unguided ordenance or a walleye with like 3km range for moving targets.

So yes, any plane that has to get within 3-5km of a Pantsir to fight back is essentially a free kill.

Well then, don’t use it as CAS

Can’t check rn so idk what its ground BR. But aren’t there better cas option than F-18A?

I’m talking only about ARB BR.
GRB not much difference if you play above 11.0 setup.

<1/100 evade = actually unflareable