As if they don’t already?
Legacy vehicles like the 229 and others, are long forgotten and poorly modeled, hopefully one day we can see remodeling for more old vehicles, same as KTs, bc ngl lots of vehicles need it, specially the Begleitpanzer…
It was not labeled due to my report not having an evidence towards the drogue parachute.
Research and document acquisition take time, however the report for the drogue parachute has been submitted and forwarded to the developers.
It is clearly documented the V3 was the standard used to present to the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM) only fitted with guns at the time, ETC 503 racks were envisaged onto the frame, not physically. This is a wrong claim for the V3 standard.
When the V6 prototype came to be, only then the ETC 503 racks were integrated. Technical documents for the Ho-8-229 V3-V6 confirm this from my understanding.
However it is unknown where the physical V6 prototype went, there is documentation four prototypes were captured; But most people miss that RLM wanted the aircraft operational than the estimated 1947 they were given, so Gotha was put into the picture and they manufactured several more prototypes to speed things up.
V6 has complete technical documents and was pretty much the improved version of the V3, like the V3 is to the V2. I think it would be a nice event vehicle if Gaijin requests the V6’s original technical documents, if not I will probably do it myself later this year.
I will be reporting the ejection seat later this week as I have the direct technical document for when it was implemented into the V3 after the unfortunate V2 incident, so please be patient.
I made one about 7 months ago but it was rejected despite all the resources i have submitted, but i am gald yours passed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PkHPN1ePk6Mz
A lot of low and mid tier aircraft are missing their ejections seats, it’s a shame.
here some images maybe that help
i wish if snail fix the Ho 229 and add the missing bombs !
would make cas better with it !
Spoiler
































A. L. Bentley illustrations aren’t evidence, they’re in fact often criticized as superficial from real technical documents. You also didn’t include the correct format of source listing, cover page title, authors, pg. numbers and ISBN.


