I personally haven’t played top tier naval yet. But I have a ton of indirect experience from talking to and playing alongside other naval mains who do play top tier naval a lot.
Still doesn’t change the fact that I have way more WT naval experience than you.
You on the other hand:
So then why are you talking to me about experience?
What nonsense is that?
I say that I understand how to play against the same Scharnhorst, as I have met him in battle. You say I have more experience in the game in the Navy, what does that have to do with it?
EVERYTHING
You really want to do stat comparisons? In your position? Welp lets compare:
You
Comulative number of battles in top BR bracked (6.0 - 7.0) ship = 0
Me
Comulative number of battles in top BR bracked (6.0 - 7.0) ship = 236
Again how?!
So you met the 7.0 Scharn in your 5.7 Eugen somehow. How exactly did you “play” against her? Most likely you were instantly blown up.
You are like March cats that lick each other about. You don’t know that there is a setup, that you can get one step higher… In short, you need to finish with this
By adding 6.0 aircraft? Still doesn’t explain how you can “understand” how to play against Scharn just from being blown up by her.
I’ve been blown up hundreds of times in all sorts of ships by the Scharn in naval EC where BR spread doesn’t matter. So by that reasoning, you could say I also “understand” how to “play” against Scharn hundreds of times better than you. LMFAO
You started it. Remember? You’re the one who needs to “finish” with this nonsense.
And I’ll finish. It doesn’t matter, you will go on and on about the same thought like a madman, just to prove your point.
Just like you.
The fact is that you are wrong about Germany suffering, you are wrong about H-40B being laid down and being similar to Yamato, you are wrong about Tirpitz not being strong in WT environment, you are wrong about H-39 being (much) better than Bismarck/Tirpitz in WT environment, and you clearly don’t understand WT naval and how strong Scharn is right now.
Finish this by accepting all that, or just go on coping and seething as much as you like.
Well, here. We’re kind of done, aren’t we? And you start over, you really are crazy, in a bad sense of the word. Farewell
I’ll take that as accepting defeat. Farewell then.
Big oof.
And it stomps other battleships with ease:
Ofc that’s not enough for this nation’s well-know fanboys
I could be wrong in thinking this but is the Belt Armour of the Renown one giant welded piece? Because once I get hit by 1 high caliber shell the ENTIRE broadside belt plate/torp belt evaporates and leaves the side of the ship exposed. Is this something that will be resolved soon with a model of multiple individual plates like the scharnhorst and such. Or will it stay like this as if it were the Prinz Eugen?
What you are talking about is torpedo buldge. It covers almost entire side of your ship and it indeed disappears after being shot. Beneath it there is your actual armor.
Would it not in real life still stay as part of the armour profile even if hit once by a shell? Though less effective as it would have had some small sections with water inside? From what I understand torpedo bulges are designed as walled compartments with small vent holes in them.
The Scharnhorst is definitely top dog in Naval RB.
