This Br would be absolutely hilarious, we would have only 6 planes, the Mig-23, the F-8U, the F-111A, the G-91A, the Milan and the Stikmaster, it would be so unbalanced
2 Likes
We will se when i complete my chart
1 Like
XD Historically correct would be Ha-Go vs M26. Have fun playing historically Japanese, Ki-27 vs B-29 or Chi-Nu vs Jumbo or Pershing. So would Pz. II and Pz. 38 vs KV-1 and T-34.
Could work for sim, events instead of the brackets. Problem is balancing spawns, there is no penalty for leaving a match so anything i can think off the top of my head wont work because players would just leave the match. Grind aspect also eats into possibilities.
Only thing I can really think of is incentivising people playing weaker vehicles in battles by awarding hefty multipliers to rewards ie you get significantly more rp/sl for taking out a tiger in your 57 sherman than a hellcat or killing a jumbo in pz4 vs panther etc…
This would also help with iff, gaijin doesnt want to do anything about it and vocal people in the sim community are against anything making iff easier and content with having a gamemode less popular than naval realistic.
1 Like
No, this chart is only based of year of introduction Ha Go 2.0, M26 3.7, KI-27 2.3, B-29 3.3-3.7, Chi-nu 3.3, Panzer II 2.0, Panzer 38t 2.3, KV-2 2.7, T-34 2.3
Yes, beautiful game Chi-Nu vs Tiger 1/2, Panther, pershing etc.
1 Like
this means F-22 in 12.7 and Su-57 in 14.3
This system simply does not work. People have already given plenty of examples, it’s just not possible.
5 Likes
Hell nah bro what is this
2 Likes
Greatness in the making
Live footage of Concept 3 Vs a Leopard 2(it fumbled the flank)
Also PBV 301 Vs early F-5s?
How would this work with partially built vehicles?
5 Likes
I think it could work as an event as long as the reward structure or game mode fit, but as a regular game mode ya its bunk.
Some of my most memorable times playing vics in SQUAD was playing as insurgents and doing things like taking out an abrams with a bmp1, or shredding a bradley with a toyota hilux with dual 23mm AA in the back.
I wish they leaned more into that type of gameplay for the SEAD event, would have been cool if it was like F4S vs mig21 w/ r3 and equal team sizes, but problem is thats bad for the defenders from a rp/sl perspective if the SAMS are doing the heavy lifting, and lack of comms.
1 Like
When wete they first tested, if they were never texted when were they finished buliding
1 Like
I could understand a very limited version of historical battles happening (AS AN EVENT) but stuff like an F-22 being at 12.7 (date of introduction should be 2005) and the Tucano being at the same BR (date of introduction should be 2003) is not possible and clearly shows the weakness of this system.
For reference:
F-22:
Tucano:
3 Likes
historical matchmaking in ground would be even less balanced
5 Likes
Who cares about balancing! Life is not balanced! Thats the fun of it!
can’t wait to see US mains weep at the sight of my T-72B (they are in an M48)
1 Like
sure as long as you are playing the op vehicle
would you be willing to play the worse vehicle?
Just hit me how horrid it would be if you wanted to start playing Israel air because you’d need to grind the Sakeen while fighting Sabres
1 Like
it gets even weirder if you take ammo into consideration, Germany didn’t order HEAT-FS rounds for it’s Leopard Is until the 1980s, it’s even worse for Japan as all the Type 74s would be facing M1A2s.
1 Like