what about it? just because one thing is silly doesnt give reason to do the same for other things
Well they added a missile that doesn’t exist to russia… So i think we can argue to give the maverick a bigger launch angle
it probably does exist, even if its only a prototype, the problem is the lack of information, the same is not true for the maverick which there is a lot of information about
this is not and has never been a game about symmetrical warfare because that is far more fantasy than whatever you think of the kh38
Crying about a 5 degree deadzone… are we serious?
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/the-kh-38mt-may-not-actually-exist/
So you say tweaking a missiles parameter is more fantasy then adding weapons that do not exist or planes that never carried weapons and giving them weapons?
yes, because there is a higher chance that the kh38mte does actually exist, considering there are other kh38s and mockups of it than a manual that is widespread being incorrect
one is making an educated guess the other is literal fantasy
Ok at this point you must be trolling and rage baiting. You can’t be real
I mean its just a problem in gaijins standards of information, brochures and some pictures of the kh38mte exist and thats enough for them
likewise manuals are enough to nerf the agm65
Maverick thread, look inside, Kh-38 discussion
A large issue with Russian missile tech is that the build modular systems, many components are cross compatible. For example a R-77 seeker plugs straight into a R-27ER, no fuss no muss and not extensive testing phases.
This has nothing to do with the KH-38MT.
Hmmmm I Ctrl-f ed my comment and got zero results for Kh-38MT… Is Kh-38MT in the room now?
Are u shure ?
The change was a while ago and was talked about on the forum.
It is a limit of the seeker. Unless there are better documents that show it to be wrong, it wont be changed.
Honestly, I couldn’t find when the AGM-65 was nerfed. What update did they nerf it in?