Reading comprehension
But even the Roland has some issues, even though I quite like it
machine translation failure more like.
I don’t see how can this be hard to understand. Reading comprehension needed on your side D
Maybe try seeing? lol
It is fun trying to decipher what your translator spits out.
Never said that at all.
But this just appears to be a random collection of words. This usually happens when using a translator.
This also usually happens when using a translator.
And where exactly did he assume that?..
here
He just needed to throw out an insult to make himself feel good.
From what im seeing of the vehicle stats on https://thunderskill.com/en/vehicles , the SPAA in question have a 56% and 42% win rates. But the planes in the SPAA’s BR range seem to mostly have win rates of 50% to the high 60% ranges.
So things seem to be pretty balanced on the surface if not trending more favorably towards the planes slightly.
Careful, you used a word that could upset them and get your post flagged…
Eh, its reddit 2.0, you could say “thank you” and get flagged so i’m not bothered in the slightest lol
1 Like
These 2 are not ideal for anti tank. 247 for no solid AP, pgz for -2 depression
Usually no planes are spawned around the BR, thus SPAA are usually used as a backup autocannon against grounds. By statshark.net , m247 shares a ~40% WR with impchap, while xm246 with 35mm is higher with ~45%.
All of them are american so they are having a similar playerbase. Note Gepard has ~39%, probably due to leo1 and the german playerbase. Type 87 went back to 45%. PGZ holds 45 despite having the -2. Brits za and falcon have insanely high (not insane, >50 is higher than others tho) WR for they are the best autocannon spammers.
Got ur idea Thank you
Just more proof of my point. Technically things are balanced good.
Me either. Im just here for the laughs at this point. I already gave them plenty of info to help them if they cared enough to look at it.
Balanced by the ground force for ground only battles cuz planes are easily denied, Yes.
1 Like
Well they do seem to care about something, but that definetly not being improving
1 Like
I don’t have PGZ09 so I cannot comment that vehicle but I do own M247 and IMO its the best SPAA in this BR bracket. The biggest advantage is having no tracer shell. But on the other hand its AT performance is rather poor so its basically pure SPAA vehicle.
There’s a reason the engagement range of 8.7 - 9.3 CAS is 2.5 - 5km, balanced with the engagement range of those SPAA systems.
1 Like
You still rely on your unfounded assumptions. Ping doesn’t matter unless its over 400, and my ping is only 28, this is not CS or Call of Duty.
Should I mention you at this BR that even the heli won’t have over 3.5km range ATGM
And that’s why based on your link is unreliable, even though you don’t even have a test drive.
Because you always use things you don’t actually know anything about to expound your terrible theories. Ignorance is not terrible, but pretending to be knowledgeable is.
I don’t remember how many times I have mentioned that based on win rate is not reliable.
Have you checked Pantisir and ito90’s Win rate? The French one has better K/D and win rate, so should they be considered they do having similar performance?
Again, pls have a test drive or using custom battle to test, the lock range is 15km, and don’t forget the plane respawn point is far from 15km as well, but for an experienced Spaa player,r normally won’t lock them to avoid if the plane has RWR, you can even turn off radar and using air alert to show the plane alt and direction.