But Gaijin said
I also love how “rare” the Tiger 2 105 and Panther II supposedly are, yet I’m pretty sure if I started counting how many of them I see per match, its at least one of them every other match when I play from 6.7 to 7.7. Like I just died to one in my T29 that shot me straight through my turret cheek. Instead of ricocheting, it went through the first layer of the mantlet and the round fuzed and overpressured my turret, blowing up my ammo. Like, no joke I see more of them when I play 7.0 than I see the Maus at 7.7, its wild. I’ve seen teams with 3 or 4 Panther II’s all at once.
Seriously, with how common these two tanks already are, why not just nerf the “unrealistic” aspects of them and make them available for research around the anniversary like the Maus? Its a win-win for everyone. People who like them being exclusive still have a limit on who has it, and people who want it have a non-zero chance. On top of this, non-Germany players also win because they’d be more balanced once made a little more realistic.
But yeah, it actually hurts my soul to know that if I had played the game like 8 months sooner than I did I could have them, but now there’s literally zero chance of getting them. Like its crazy to think that I have a higher chance of getting the IS-7, Surblinde, or Object 279 than to get something as basic as a Tiger 2 with a 105 cannon, or a Panther that actually has a functioning reverse gear lol
3 Likes
There are so many solutions. Make them available on anniversaries. Or only available to people who have completely researched the German ground tree. Or give people who get to level 150 of a battle pass the chance to trade in the coupon upgrades in exchange for a vehicle that’s otherwise completely inaccessible (not just limited to the three German vehicles). Or hell, sell an “Ancestor Pack” on the store that has the three removed vehicles.
The only thing lacking is the will to do it.
It may be pure copium but I think they’ll come back one day. Just not for many many years.
1 Like
Just like the IS-7, Surblinde, and Object 279, they could put them in Silver Lion packs as well. Possibilities are endless. I’ve even seen people say if they put all of the removed German vehicles into a paid bundle for a limited time they’d buy it
1 Like
God knows I would.
I am just gonna drop this here:
move it to 7.7 if the T29 is 7.0
better mobility, better gun, faster reload, better armor
1 Like
The master troll strikes again.
what a clown.
Prove me wrong then
1 Like
how is a tank with twice the reload time better at 0.3 higher br?
(armor ,mobility and gun handling is very similar, tiger II has much better hull armor)
Guess you are falling into the bullshit of a tank is as good as the stats players make for it.
How is it sane that after 9 years they decide to completely destroy the T29 capability to hold its own against multiple enemies in close quarter combat?
How does it make sense that the 12 second reload was okay for 9 YEARS???
And now suddenly gaijin says, lets fuck over everyone who bought it.
PS:
you would not hide your profile and comment history unless you are only here to take your perversion in trolling
1 Like
And T29 has much better turrent armor not to mention 12.7mm that allow it to destroy lightly armored vehicles and planes.
Lmao
19.4s reload is still not as long as other heavies, like IS-3.
Or maybe because trolls like to go around and abuse flagging on forum?
You can see my profile in WT if You want to see how I play with both vehicles.
Edit: Or are we talking about Tiger II H? Because if that is the reason then if You belive that it is better than T29 then ye… nothing can help You. (I thought about Tiger II 105 as You have posted a video of it)
When it comes to Tiger II H, You have much more firepower in terms of explosive mass, again 12.7mm, better armor and mobility.
Flawless logic. Lets give all Tiger II and the panther II 15 sec reload. They will still be better than IS-3.
checkmate.
having a 12.7mm machine gun == double the reload time and you are still better off
LMAO
If You only want good reload then go for vehicles that have it much better?
I wonder why You haven’t played Tiger II H if it is soo good.
bytheway, this not an answer, you know it right?
you realize the is-3 has less crew, a much smaller turret, and bigger caliber ammo?
It is as You are pointing out that the vehicle lost its capability to “hold its own against multiple enemies in CQC” while it haven’t and I have pointed out that other heavies that have much bigger reload are doing fine.
Wow, just as i suspected, a troll.
The only troll here is the one that only looks at reload time while ignoring that T29 is much better than Tiger II H in all other fields.
Sure, its much better, keep saying that. Unreal :D
Ignore everything, just repeat that. Flawless.
T29 is more mobile, has better armor and can defend against planes/light vehicles without having to fire main gun, I guess it is much worse!
That makes so much sense, i see it now.
I just dont have to see any medium or have tank and I am fine. 7.0 is anyways only light tanks, I rarely see a t44 or tiger II anyways. I bow before your genius, now I am enlightened.
Thanks!!!
And You can kill them with ease as You have better gun/pen/armor?