Makes it really funny to throw it from high up too
Not Germany and Sweden?
Spoiler
you mf not even trying anymore
2 Likes
tbh us is better cuz abrams ngl
Sweden is probably better, 122B+, PLSS, 122A, 2A6, Ito
2S6 struggling to hit a drone past 8km.
That thing is hard countered by A-10A, let alone anything better.
MICA/120
Sweden
Kamov is good until AA shows up, then FnFs are easily better.
They just need to remove IOG from AGMs for every single made up excuse they gave for why Brimstones have to be so heavily nerfed.
Wouldnt totally mitigate the problem, but would level the playing field greatly
2 Likes
pfff what? MICA?? that thing has shortest range of all fox 3
Nah, I’d place MICA solid number 2. That thing is scary at closer ranges. Especially coupled to the AESA and HMD equipped Rafale
In GRB its definetly number 1 due to the inherrently smaller map sizes.
1 Like
scary at close range, yes but what the purpose of ARH?
Bro … Kh-38 exists you know?
4 Leclercs though 🤢
But most shots in GRB are WVR
Even within BVR (at ASB ranges), I’d place it at number 2.
AIm-120/AAM-4 as joint first, they do have the greatest range, though I dont think its quite as great a difference as most (usually soviet mains) make it out to be.
MICA second because they still have fairly usable range and are deadly at shorter ranges, where I find half the time im fighting anyway, despite best efforts to stay further from the fight, even in ASB the maps are too small. In GRB, which is the main focus of this thread. Range is totally irrelevant. All top tier ARHs are well within range
Third I think the PL-12, good overall balanced performance
R-Darter/R-77/Derby here because they have strong limitations but perfectly usable when employed right.
I have yet to get around to playing an ASB since the update, so not had a chance to fight Su-30SMs yet properly, so wont comment on R-77-1 yet
We’re talking about GRB.
AASM is on-par with or superior to the KH-38s, which have a habit of not lofting as much and smacking into a wall in an urban map
4 Leclercs is only a bad thing if you are a bad player
1 Like
Nah. They are both incredibly annoying because of range + IOG. But KH-38s are much much faster, which makes them even more potent in an Urban environment because the target cannot get behind cover as quickly (either intentionally or unintentionally)
Missiles missing due to the loft is a user error issue, not a game breaking issue thing.
Quantity of tanks means very little if those tanks all have major issues that can barely compete with the Leopard 2s, T-80/90s and Abrams.
its like like saying Britain is a meta nation because we have 6 Challenger 2s and a Challenger 3. Even though they are some of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and Germany is the weakest nation because they only have 1x Leopard 2A7V
4 Likes
too slow and easy to intercept by pantsir
yeah, i saw your K/D on them proved point even further they are bad can’t complete with T-80BVM or uparmored Leopard
1 Like
The lofting trajectory makes it actually hard to intercept them. It’s easier for the 95Ya6 to intercept a funnily enough a missile going straight than a missile that actually climbs and makes it burn its energy
Don’t go off of my K/D, I’m not that great of a tanker
Unlike most people with low scores though, I know better than to blame the tools
As mentioned before, cap can be really great at ruining a cas player’s day however you have to be hoping the enemy team isn’t doing cap themselves. I do agree we should reduce cap cost. Cap should cost same as bringing in a heli with rockets.