Idk which regions servers you’re plaing on but i can happily inform you that in the last couple of weeks I’ve been playing with or against a lot of US teams that have been absolutely wiping the battlefield. even against Russia/germany or sweden. And I’m playing france without fixed wing cap, german without fixed wing cap or russia without fixed wing cap (simply because i don’t have them researched yet) and solo, not in a squad.
Those players (a lot of them with chinese nicknames) must know something we or you don’t? Or the players playing france with top tier winrates similar to those top 3 nations with the best mbts?
I’ve heard the same aswell as that they’re not as good as they are IRL. It’s good for the Frenchies that they have something to work with, though.
So when Russia does well it’s obvious bias but when America does well it’s because they’re better at the game?
Or they’re cheating. Anyhow it is very important to always have an explanation or reason ready as to why others are seemingly always better. Makes for better reasoning why you’ve been killed again and why the other team (obviously) won again. One thing’s for certain: It’s never your own fault. Big plus is also: Takes away the pressure and the need to improve
US doesnt suffer at all,all these were at 11.7/12.7 as i had F-16C in lineup
You would cry about Ka-52 then if those get removed lmao. Or BVMs armor.
I guess he doesn’t realize that the best way to make a game less successful is to not play it or buy things in it
Not only he’s giving money to the company he thinks is biased and fueled by propaganda, he’s also buying those bias machines with fictional armor, basically giving Gaijin a thumbs up for all their work.
I guess that the average consumer nowadays don’t really know what “voting with your wallet” means. No wonder we have mid tier GPUs going for 800 euros.
Awwww how cute, you cried to a mod. I live rent-free in your heads. Adorable.
Anyways.
Again, tell me you didn’t actually read what I typed without telling me you didn’t actually read what I typed.
honestly id argue 2s6 is as good as ADATS in a top tier environment, both have about the same effective range while, ADATS is a bit better against planes and helis but only works like 1/2 the time when there arent any cloulds, while 2s6 is a lot better at intercepting incoming missiles and can work in bad weather
ADATS is about the same, might be a bit more manuverable but you cant tell where your missile is
at least it can lock from 3rd person, with ADATS you need to go into the sights and spam lock to try to find it, on top of only being able to lock most missiles around 3km out when there arent clouds, I have only managed to intercept anything like once in ADATS
the one big advantage for ADATS is no launch warning if they dont have MAWs but ive found I can hear the missile and dodge in time in anything except f15e
Wondering here, is the MAWS the warning triggered by the radio commands used to guide the missile (IRST search and lock obviously doesnt trigger anything) but as soon as sam is launched and guided towards you it triggers or is that something else, additional? Like detecting missile launch → Warning unrelated to the guidance commands? Or is it that? picking up the radio commands and rwr is just the radar search and lock detection?
IIRC ADATS doesnt trigger RWR launch warnings
MAWS is using either IR sensors or small radars to detect incoming missiles
k so it could be both. Obviosly its Missile Approach Warning but how that works in specific cases would take more reasearch than I’m willing to do atm xD. afaik you can detect like an IR flash upon missile launch but probably also includes something like guidance commands as detected by jets.
But then again, how is the adats missile guided then? its not beamriding, its not cable like tows with that speed and range, maybe its just a radio band thats not detected?
Im pretty sure it is beam riding
rn in game there are two different missile warning systems, one is RWR detecting guidance signals in radio frequency or CW illumination used for semi active radar missiles
the other is MAW which activates if a missile is in the air within a certain distance from the aircraft and in its coverage angles
most high tier RWRs have very comprehensive launch warning from RWR but only a few planes have MAW and some of those it only covers rear sector so wont give a warning from AA when flying towards the battlefield
I see, so it is the RWR detecting the guidance signals and not the MAWS, thx for clarifiying
it indeed beamriding and those RWR system won’t warn you. if it a cloudy map, the ADATS is useless
even if its just a bit foggy or whatever ADATS wont be able to lock anything while air to ground IR seekers sometimes still can lock in track and can pretty much always lock in point mode
also i kinda find it weird that Pantsir S1 has gen 2 thermal but the 2S6M1 has gen 3
It’s so you can watch your missile fall out of the air after 4-5km in high fidelity.