Wondering if you had played red alert 2 lol
1 Like
Obviously, because it’s not for the 38MT. It does benefit the 38ML, which is still a Russian armament fielded by Russia in the game.
What I stated prior still carries complete fact.
Because it was bug reported
1 Like
Yet the Hammer, Maverick and Brimstone that have been bug reported for their missing features still don’t have them.
Hmmmm. Funny, that.
Such as? Btw hammers have the same system
2 Likes
Their actual operational ranges and their actual lock-on modes and ranges, for immediate example. We got plenty of bug reports and discussion threads around on them. To ask me such a question indicates you either skipped those threads or just memory-dumped them.
Or you know, I’m not aware cause I’m not on the forums all the time?
1 Like
Or that, granted. Fair.
Rounding back, NATO armaments are still in very gimped states compared to Russia in-game and the severe imbalance, especially at top tier, continues entirely permitted and supported by Gaijin.
Then stop crying about it, everyone is biased towards their nation.
1 Like
There is a significant difference between just the playerbase having their preferences and the literal game developers having their preferences and designing the game around their preferences.
You are completely missing the forest for the trees and it shows.
Exactly what I’m trying to say . you’re never going to see Call of Duty portray Russia as the good side.
1 Like
lolwat? 2.5km range guns does not make SPAA anywhere close to good at 12.0 let alone OP.
Pantsir’s missile is SACLOS, which is inferior to F&F missiles with same and longer ranges.
The strongest naval faction on live server is Germany, not Soviets. With USA in 2nd.
Next update Soviets join Germany in being strong. However, Iowa and Yamato are being added at the same time so time will tell.
@GNDM_Panzer
So everything NATO is Russian to you to this day… Wild.
Hammer and Kh-38 having GNSS is not exclusively Russian either.
Kh-38MT’s range goes from 30km to… 30km by getting GNSS. No change.
@hora11
He’ll complain about European and American made games forever.
Also COD World at War portrays the Soviets as the good guys.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Let’s not lie to ourselves and say the guns aren’t a big plus for an SPAA to have. SACLOS really isn’t that bad either. Sure it can be worse, but its comes with its own set of advantages so I don’t think its that much of a con
SACLOS is good, and it’s better than early IR missiles like Stinger or Strela’s.
However, it’s not better than long-range F&F missiles, especially those using radar locks.
SLM’s delta-V was increased by ~57% since last dev, and it’s not released yet which is why I have no statements on the new SPAA.
Commenting on speculation helps no one.
4 Battles 4 Times got completely shredded by ruskis in Minutes srsly how deep can this game sink. I gave them MUCH Money in those 5 Years im playing but I play less and less. I have every Nation Top Tier Air AND Ground but its not fun anymore only greed and bias not with me
The future doesn´t look better. At first i thought the new upcoming SPAAs are going to balance things out, but now they also add DIRCM to russian choppers, what makes them completly immune to even the new SPAAs.
I swear, i start believing gaijin is just made up of a bunch of pathetic russian nationalists.
1 Like
You mean how SACLOS can be defeated by just breaking LoS from the missile truck ?
With IR missiles you need to break LoS from the missile itself, as the truck is pretty much irrelevant once the missile activates it’s IR seeker.
Well, thats exactly what it is. If you know any of those people they are sick. For anyone who had any contact with this nation there’s no suprise they do what they do in this game. They can’t even make a video game fair.
Meanwhile this Alvisvisla guy jumps on every single thread where someone mentions russian bias almost immediately to dement it - he has 75 win ratio in soviet.
These people will never change this company will fall it’s just a matter of time.
@BazieStook First off, win rate is a skill metric, and a metric for teams not players.
Win rate cannot determine if vehicles are OP or not.
Second, Sea Vixen [73%], Sherman I Composito [85%], Stuart VI [81%], M5A1 [79%], F-6C-10 [78%], JAS39C [74%], Centurion Mk2 [74%], M4A4 [73%], Mirage 4000 [72%], F/A-18A [72%]… none of these are Soviet vehicles. Sea Vixen has my highest KDR of any vehicle in the game even, and it’s British.