Then please grind out the Russian tech tree and show us your stats.
Should be the easiest way to proof how OP russia is, no ?
4 Likes
Nah, there is no point in going that far.
He said he has so much proof so it shouldn’t be that hard to post it.
But it is always like that with people on forum, big mouth, big words, no evidence and proof.
3 Likes
Pick one.
I don’t need to show you any evidence, trust me bro.
Gaijin removes any video on the internet they don’t like.
This forum is filled with witch hunters.
1 Like
Not at all. I use the a7d at 11.3 and dont really struggle
It’s funny how the War Thunder subreddit has zero complaints about DMCA’d War Thunder content… cause the only DMCA’d War Thunder content are cheaters uploading their cheat adverts.
3 Likes
Russian doctrine fits the average mentality of “not one step back” found in Pubs. The reason it is so good is because Russians were like, “what if we just made brawlers instead of snipers” and did what everyone else in War Thunder does: drive forward and shoot anything that resembles a vehicle. It’s not because Russian tanks are OP, it’s just that no other tank in the game fits that mentality.
Leopards and Challys, you snipe with.
Abrams and Merkavas, you support with.
Types, Arietes, and Chinese tanks you flank with.
Russians you brawl.
Simple understanding of doctrine makes your game so much easier.
2 Likes
Flank with that thing?
nah they just speed of average Leopard it can but not fast enough to be considering as flanker
more like long range sniper (when it said long i mean it)
I’ve messed with it in Customs, it’s not too bad of a flanker, but you’re right. It really doesn’t do anything right. It basically relies on sniping or flanking because the second it is looked at… well, you’re respawninh.
1 Like
I brawl with all tanks, and Soviet tanks are actually worse to brawl with.
Brawling requires reload, ammo, and mobility…
Sniping is long-range brawling, which relies more on armor than close range brawling does.
Arietes are poor snipers because they lack armor.