@Saberzen
Your post is hardcore defending Russian equipment; I don’t know if that’s your intention.
Pantsir, ADATS, ITO-90M are all trash no matter what you say. Pantsir is physically incapable of dealing with F-15E, Su-34, Rafale, etc.
You have a problem with that? Get in your Pantsir and I’ll get in F-15E or Su-34, your choice, and we’ll see who has more deaths at the end of 30 minutes. Spoiler: My F-15E will have zero deaths.
Inb4 one of your future posts whataboutism and move the goalposts to enemy fighter aircraft.
I do see quad feeds in matches: Oh would you look at that, those aircraft were facing Pantsirs but stood outside the range of Pantsir.
Spoiler
And they’re as rare/common as Sukhoi frag feeds.
Pantsir cannot frag ANY meta CAS in War Thunder that’s played correctly, it doesn’t have the 25km range for it.
You speak for no NATO nations, your post is trashing on NATO and defending Russia. Your post attacks NATO citizens and claim NATO is Russia.
If Pantsir was in the US tech tree you’d trash on it admitting it’s bad against Su-34, F-15E, Rafale, etc.
Your memories are at least mostly correct, your psyche is fine. Your perspective and opinions are valuable.
Can we get AGM 84 F/A 18 the us navy Just use them to strike targets on land the have always had that Ability. Watch; your own justification for not giving it to the F/A18 is bias Because Russia use kh-38 Which out Rang most NATO SPAA IN game it’s crazy we have to argue what’s fair again showing a bias it’s laughable that we have to argue NATO superiority if Russian equipment was so good As displayed in war thunder There will be less scrap metal. Ivan did made a little video game and started playing with other people and got carried away
@NEVERAGAIN_FTH
Yes, AGM-84 can come to the game.
It wouldn’t be the improvement over AGM-65 you’re thinking it will be either.
Also thanks for admitting that I have American and NATO bias, though you too call NATO and America Russia a few times.
You even claim Europe is Russia at the end of your post.
Also Russian equipment is as bad as displayed in War Thunder.
All you have to do is look at the disparity between equipment in the United States tech tree in the Russian tree. It’s not that Americans didn’t create cool equipment or amazing vehicles. The game just doesn’t give it to us There are so Many fighting vehicles that the United States have created throughout the years, but there are literally only one IFV in the tree and that’s the Bradley AT ALMOST 11. The Bradley was introduced to counter the BTR 86 Which is at 7.0 Might I remind you? Tell me that’s not bias
Yes, the disparity proves how bad Soviet/Russian equipment is.
Soviets need significantly newer equipment to MATCH our older equipment in capability, if Soviet equipment was ever better than America’s then their 1960s technology would be facing our 2000’s technology.
It’s funny how your post claims there’s American bias at the end.
But they do come at the cost of a poorer platform, which is why I don’t agree with 30SM getting 38s.
Sheer amount of Brimstones definitely help Tornado and their IOG makes them a quasi-FnF weapon, unlike 25ML, all the while PGMs give it some true FnF capability.
I don’t see a reason why those two can’t share the same BR.
No im claiming no American bias I’m literally saying there’s only one American IFV Which is the Bradley Almost at 11.0 No striker combat vehicles no Marine Corps AAC SO THE US GETS NONE OF ITS WILLIE BOY IFV’S
The us has be operating strikers since the 90s I’m just saying there old ass dirt And not one is represented the M118 Is not a striker combat vehicle but a tank killer It’s a mobile gun system
Strikers are so old that they’re getting rid of them. The army is getting rid of its striker combat brigade units. They’re downsizing them replacing them with the new IFVS
The M3A3 Bradley is 10.3, not 11.0. There’s also LAV-AD, M3 Bradley, XM800 as a recon vehicle, ADATS built on a Bradley chassis, M1128 infantry support vehicle, countless M163 chassis vehicles…
Styker with TOW missiles will come in time, as will HUMVEEs, Soviets are missing BTR variants as well that I’d prefer to have in-game.
Development takes time.
As if half the teams for Russia aren’t made of Su-30s and 34s?
Just this morning I had a match where of 8 people alive, like 6 were in Su-30s/34s. They were just firing Kh-38 after Kh-38 after Kh-38. They’d fire them at the spawn before people spawned in, so the moment someone DID spawn they would have 5 missiles up their rear end.
Nothing changes drastically for GRB, other than it makes it truly combined arms and also allows for a hard, Capable counter, which unless its a mixed battle with Pantsir’s on both sides, we don’t have.
The other option is Ground Only, but it seems few people really want that.
At the end of the day, man, you wouldn’t have all of us here literally complaining about something if there wasn’t a problem it’s kind of like an intervention or a coming to Jesus moment before people say hey enough is enough Because if you can sit here and say that there is not a despair in the equipment that nations are given purposely Gaijin Could have been given these nations this equipment and we wouldn’t have this problem or argument. Honestly, the game would work 50 times better.
If your post is against Russia, why are you claiming Pantsir can frag Su-34s when we know it can’t?
If your post was actually against Russia you would be SUPPORTING new SPAA superior to Pantsir to be added, not equal, not inferior, superior.
You would not be dismissing F-15E and Rafale despite having the same kit or in F-15E’s case a superior kit.
And gaslighting means to make you question your sanity; I am respecting you and treating you as an equal, that is not gaslighting.
I’m calling your posts wrong, and your posts aren’t you either.
Your memories are at least mostly correct, your psyche is fine. Anyone saying otherwise is gaslighting you.
