Not just DU. Also other than official papers theres nothing proven. If u talking about gayjin calculation its just stupid cuz its THEIR calcualtion. Ofc manpads situation tells a lot about gayjin and that their calculations are worth nothing
Btw dude has a point there are many bug reports sitting for few years. The best include volumetric turret ring and missing bulkhead armor
US on other BRs than top tier yes is better but NOT as broken as russian cas on top tier. Its just next level
Russian 3rd gen isnt technically 3rd gen. So yes its overperforming
What in the hell? XD t80 is like ⅔ of abrams. Not to mention Sepv2 with its antennas
Yea vikchrs are to only one that can shoot trough smoke.
And no non-FnF arent trash. Stated above vikchr and hellfire (which is very good)
What? FnF hellfires? I missed smth?
Lol. Yes are very small and cramped. But the killing crew one by one is true. Everyone that played against t tank knows that shooting turret will hardly result in 2 crew kill
Yeah have you considered moving your ass after popping smoke instead of standing their and let the Heli guess your position right ? No FnF = trash , stop the cap
It overperforms and underperforms at the same time, the heavy ERA degrades dart performance without angle when it shouldn’t do that. HSTV-L for example, will struggle to penetrate the side of Russian tanks with the ERA bags and flat panel ERA underneath, when the bags should be the only armor actually functioning to degrade the projectile. The only times when it will provide less protection in game than IRL are at very extreme angles.
ERA without a sufficient angle is just spicy spaced armor.
Also you seriously underestimate the level of underperformance NATO ERA, CR2 applique being the posterchild of “wow this should be way better than it currently is”. ARAT 1 and 2 as well, but the specs of that are classified and can’t really be corrected.
Gaijin literally took manufacturer documents as their source to reduce AT-16 penetration.
Shouldn’t forget how AGM-65 penetration was annihilated from 1850mm (realistic for 250 pound bomb with wings and a hollow charge) down to 850mm (ridiculously low) because of an internal report that had no documents cited when the change was enacted. Or how literal napkin math was used as justification to reduce TOW-2B penetration, without correcting the EFP to ERA interaction that should have also been changed. Neither of those changes were cited due to actual documentation, they were just ‘feels’ or napkin math.