Bro … Kh-38 exists you know?
4 Leclercs though 🤢
But most shots in GRB are WVR
Even within BVR (at ASB ranges), I’d place it at number 2.
AIm-120/AAM-4 as joint first, they do have the greatest range, though I dont think its quite as great a difference as most (usually soviet mains) make it out to be.
MICA second because they still have fairly usable range and are deadly at shorter ranges, where I find half the time im fighting anyway, despite best efforts to stay further from the fight, even in ASB the maps are too small. In GRB, which is the main focus of this thread. Range is totally irrelevant. All top tier ARHs are well within range
Third I think the PL-12, good overall balanced performance
R-Darter/R-77/Derby here because they have strong limitations but perfectly usable when employed right.
I have yet to get around to playing an ASB since the update, so not had a chance to fight Su-30SMs yet properly, so wont comment on R-77-1 yet
We’re talking about GRB.
AASM is on-par with or superior to the KH-38s, which have a habit of not lofting as much and smacking into a wall in an urban map
4 Leclercs is only a bad thing if you are a bad player
1 Like
Nah. They are both incredibly annoying because of range + IOG. But KH-38s are much much faster, which makes them even more potent in an Urban environment because the target cannot get behind cover as quickly (either intentionally or unintentionally)
Missiles missing due to the loft is a user error issue, not a game breaking issue thing.
Quantity of tanks means very little if those tanks all have major issues that can barely compete with the Leopard 2s, T-80/90s and Abrams.
its like like saying Britain is a meta nation because we have 6 Challenger 2s and a Challenger 3. Even though they are some of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and Germany is the weakest nation because they only have 1x Leopard 2A7V
4 Likes
too slow and easy to intercept by pantsir
yeah, i saw your K/D on them proved point even further they are bad can’t complete with T-80BVM or uparmored Leopard
1 Like
The lofting trajectory makes it actually hard to intercept them. It’s easier for the 95Ya6 to intercept a funnily enough a missile going straight than a missile that actually climbs and makes it burn its energy
Don’t go off of my K/D, I’m not that great of a tanker
Unlike most people with low scores though, I know better than to blame the tools
As mentioned before, cap can be really great at ruining a cas player’s day however you have to be hoping the enemy team isn’t doing cap themselves. I do agree we should reduce cap cost. Cap should cost same as bringing in a heli with rockets.
This would be a slippery slope for GRB.
How so? Can’t the Z-10 carry 16 AAM?
It could invite fighter jockeys from ARB.
The Su34 is a poor platform when compared to others but by how much that warrants it to keep the Kh38?
and?
People complain about CAS
reduce the cost of CAP
CAP numbers increase and you get skilled ARB players playing GRB
CAS in top tier GRB is hard countered.
I really dont see the problem here.
He considers the Su-34 to be equally bad as the Tornado just FYI.
If it gets clubbed by other 12.7 jets I’d say the difference is pretty big.
Like how Ground RB invites ground pound gals from ARB?
It ain’t much of a difference, really. It just gives full value to the idea of Combined Arms instead of the half “oh well you need X amount of SP to play combined arms” now.
1 Like
And with this you turn GRB into a quasi-ARB, hijacking the mode in the process making people that want to play tanks get shafted anyways.
I consider SM3 to be worse than Tornado at A2A while being at a higher BR with similar A2G performance.
Su-34 is better than that but definitely isn’t anything special overall when compared to other things at 12.7.
It would be a big difference if half of the teams were nothing but fighter jockeys that are fighting outside of range of anything spawnable on the ground.