Granted I’ve not played the Rafale, so cannot comment personally on them, but I hear the Hammers are a real nasty piece of kit.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Idk which regions servers you’re plaing on but i can happily inform you that in the last couple of weeks I’ve been playing with or against a lot of US teams that have been absolutely wiping the battlefield. even against Russia/germany or sweden. And I’m playing france without fixed wing cap, german without fixed wing cap or russia without fixed wing cap (simply because i don’t have them researched yet) and solo, not in a squad.
Those players (a lot of them with chinese nicknames) must know something we or you don’t? Or the players playing france with top tier winrates similar to those top 3 nations with the best mbts?
I’ve heard the same aswell as that they’re not as good as they are IRL. It’s good for the Frenchies that they have something to work with, though.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
So when Russia does well it’s obvious bias but when America does well it’s because they’re better at the game?
5 Likes
Or they’re cheating. Anyhow it is very important to always have an explanation or reason ready as to why others are seemingly always better. Makes for better reasoning why you’ve been killed again and why the other team (obviously) won again. One thing’s for certain: It’s never your own fault. Big plus is also: Takes away the pressure and the need to improve
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
US doesnt suffer at all,all these were at 11.7/12.7 as i had F-16C in lineup
1 Like
You would cry about Ka-52 then if those get removed lmao. Or BVMs armor.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
I guess he doesn’t realize that the best way to make a game less successful is to not play it or buy things in it
1 Like
Not only he’s giving money to the company he thinks is biased and fueled by propaganda, he’s also buying those bias machines with fictional armor, basically giving Gaijin a thumbs up for all their work.
I guess that the average consumer nowadays don’t really know what “voting with your wallet” means. No wonder we have mid tier GPUs going for 800 euros.
Awwww how cute, you cried to a mod. I live rent-free in your heads. Adorable.
Anyways.
Again, tell me you didn’t actually read what I typed without telling me you didn’t actually read what I typed.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
honestly id argue 2s6 is as good as ADATS in a top tier environment, both have about the same effective range while, ADATS is a bit better against planes and helis but only works like 1/2 the time when there arent any cloulds, while 2s6 is a lot better at intercepting incoming missiles and can work in bad weather
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
ADATS is about the same, might be a bit more manuverable but you cant tell where your missile is
at least it can lock from 3rd person, with ADATS you need to go into the sights and spam lock to try to find it, on top of only being able to lock most missiles around 3km out when there arent clouds, I have only managed to intercept anything like once in ADATS
the one big advantage for ADATS is no launch warning if they dont have MAWs but ive found I can hear the missile and dodge in time in anything except f15e
Wondering here, is the MAWS the warning triggered by the radio commands used to guide the missile (IRST search and lock obviously doesnt trigger anything) but as soon as sam is launched and guided towards you it triggers or is that something else, additional? Like detecting missile launch → Warning unrelated to the guidance commands? Or is it that? picking up the radio commands and rwr is just the radar search and lock detection?