yes but the VT1-2 has a lot more power and a stabiliser, my main issue with the s tank is the vertical speed so the VT1-2 naturally wins even with the parralax on the gunsight for your second barrel
if only the raw pen was the only probblem and all the rest was fine yes the the comparison can be onlt that and it can stay at 9.0
i meant the mbt70 has the worst APFSDS at its BR by a massive margin
They have rather similar side armor, frontal, and the E100 takes the cake for rear armor.
Secondly, the only “true” benefits are the Increased mobility, and the first stage 6 round loader of the IS-7. Then, as it literally says online, the reload goes to 35 secs for the IS-7
Thirdly, both tanks will one shot whatever they pierce.
The E100 is clearly 8.0 worthy at the very least. And very very possibly. 8.3 worthy
Ngl class 3p should be on this list.
But I love the suggestion! I will add it, seems very balanced.
Out of all the things you’ve ever said…
This is the craziest. Maus is an exceptionally good 7.7
8.3 for a slightly better Maus lmao. Even 8.0 would be pushing it because of it’s low mobilty and easily exploitable turret armour layout.
In short the IS-7 has better firepower, much better mobilty, a much better reload, and equal armour when compared to the E-100.
1 Like
“Slightly better” sure. Just like the KV-1C is slightly better than the KV-1B.
That’s “better firepower”
IS-7:
E100:
Weird. 1mm pen difference and pretty much identical performance at range. You got me, it soooo better.
it’s also strange your defending a tank you don’t own, but like most forum users, you think it’s okay for Russian vehicles to be higher than their counterparts. I could see a gap of 0.3 for the Is-7 above the E100, but anything less is pure bias
My usage of firepower also takes into consideration post penetration damage and reload speed. The IS-7 will one shot anything it pens due to overpressure, and the IS-7 can fire 3 times in the time it takes the E-100 to reload (unless aced, but even then its close).
The irony of you calling me biased as you advocate for tanks like the Kv-1E or Kv-220 to go down in BR.
3 Likes
-
With the E100s powerful cannon, it can one shot anything. Try to find something it can’t. Again, it’s an 8.0 tank through and through.
-
The Kv-1E faces things like early panthers, and a myriad of other vehicles is cannot pen, and cannot reliably use its armor against. Same with the KV-220 which, if you hadn’t looked, go back to the origins post to see what had been changed.
The high pen round can not.
Skill issue, and don’t spawn heavies in full uptiers. I have it, and I can confidently say that it deserves it’s BR of 4.3. It’s gun isn’t that bad, and it still has a solid armour layout against anything that isn’t a Panther.
That has an armour layout equivalent the Tiger I on the hull, and good enough turret armour.
I will not discuss this further because I think that you are personally biased towards these and other Russian vehicles.
1 Like
The Panthers are all undertiered. That’s not a Kv-1 issue, that’s a Panther issue.
Just because you lose an argument, doesn’t mean I’m biased.
And he says skill issue, talk about losing and argument without saying it. 86mm pen at 4.3 is bad. Given that it can easily be killed by 3.3s and 3.0s.
With more weakspots than a Tiger I that lead to 1 hit K.O.s
With an extremely weak breech, and a very old model, which seemingly has bad gaps where welds are super weak, far weaker than they should be.
Mobility is worse, etc. I went though this in depth.
Still and APFSDS
No one ever said that,youre the only dude…
Wait no actually,you remember me of the all the people who complain about the Maus being OP even tho they lack skills to kill such tank
Same thing can be said to you for the E100,do you lack skill to kill it?Its big af,slow,half of the match youre gonna spend it driving to the middle part of the map to be then either CASed or get shot by an Howi or ATGM
So no,its not even remotely close to 8.3,hate to break it to you
4 Likes
Russia have free slacks every time,their tanks works only paper,which its why they work in WarThunder
And its not Biased,the Is7 its a death machine compared to a slow ass moving barn
No one losing this beside you lol
EVERYONE that have played multiple nations without being biased will always say that the Is7 its way superior than the E100
You see a light vehicle?Machine gun it,you have a 50 call + like 3 other coaxes
Really good cannon and ammo while being fast or even faster than some tanks at that br bracket even tho youre a heavily armored HEAVY TANK
You get disabled?No problem,just press S and do 1 km in 2 seconds for the insane reverse speed
One of the most insane heavy tanks i have ever seens not gonna lie
It deserves that BR and the E100 does not
THE E100 SHALL REMAIN THERE AT 7.7
1 Like
Be my guest.
I can tell you that it’s much easier to kill a Tiger from the side with a US 75mm than a IS-1.
3 Likes
I didn’t know the T20 was as short as an L3/33. You literally put it at an impossible angle to prove your illegitimate point. Nice. Being disingenuous now are we?
Lmao. Random as hell point. Sherman 75mm can also outload the 85mm, has better gun depression, etc.
Ah yes I should listen to the person with 1/3 the amount of experience I have in the game. The guy who also has a 4.1 KDr in the Maus. Clearly the Maus isnt good, therefore clearly the better E100 isn’t better at all.
& you only have up to rank III USSR. I have top tier in most nations.
@Ghost_of_TelAviv your thoughts on the E100?
Or
@quartas121
Bruh, how long have you been playing the game?
The constuction angle is 31°, the impact angle is 31° at best, therefore +130mm protection.
Also as far as I know, 123mm is also not 114mm as you have previously claimed.
So maybe get your facts straight.
1 Like