I see 2 T80s there lol
1 aint a premium but whatever you say
You cant prove that the E100 its the same level as the Is7 either seems like
Once again,stop being biased,if 99% of the community tells you its not,then its not
It doesnt upsets me how so ever lmfao
But calling this “balance” while putting a super heavy tank with no mobility,nor proper ordinances and very mid armor protection for how big it is and how bad shaped it is while fighting 9.3 its anything but balance mate lmfao
Xm803 and T72s breakfast more like
You know why it even has a really good KD?Maybe cause its being used by actually good player and content creators who can use this very efficiently,thats why,a noob will never buy a 3000 thousand USD tank like…ever,same goes for the IS7 and other rare vehicles
Price too high = very few people playing it = the overall stats are better since its being used by proper people instead of level 1s
Or, you’re simply the biased one. With a warped perspective because you listen to your tubers too much.
Also, T-80UK isn’t a premium correct, but it’s still not a tech tree tank.
Then why is the KV-220 at 6.0? Mid armor, weak gun.
Meanwhile the E100 aligns more with a IS-7 which you say it doesn’t, and that’s okay. That’s your opinion. Meanwhile I look at its stats, paper and performance. I haven’t even added it to the list, I really should though, clearly it over preforms… and no wonder, it is like a low tier slower IS-7.
E100 7.7 → 8.0
Reason: having similar firepower, and armor to an IS-7, with launched smoke grenades, it’s a miracle this monster has been able to stay with such a high KDr. Even as rare as it is, it looks to be a free win button.
Its cons are relatively low speed, but is far faster than a Maus, while having a steady reload.
The enemy gun is 1m taller than the plate it’s aiming at, 200m away. Then the impact angle, derived by the power of trigonometry, is a whooping 0.286°.
Congratulations. You just decreases the impact angle from 31° to 30.7°.
The ability of one tank to kill one particular tank out of 100 different vehicles it can see is completely irrelevant to its performance.
“Oh no, my (enter vehicle) that completely beats every other vehicle, can’t compete with one specific enemy. Guess it should have a lower BR because that’s how balance works.”
How doesn’t it have the same firepower? It doesn’t have the same reload if that’s what you mean. I don’t associate that with fire power, because it is an external factor from the cannon itself. In which I quite literally said the E100 reloads faster on a consistent basis, but the IS-7 will only load at a rate of 10 secs per shell for the first 6. Given after the fact, the reload spikes to 35 secs, meaning your actually slower than the E100 in reload, it’s a no brainer.
Except it has a weaker cannon, more weakspots, better side armor. The same reload, despite the kv-220 having two loaders, the commanders hatch weak point, gun breech weak point, lower mobility, forwards, rear, and turning.
Yeah definitely a Tiger E.
lol you were the one who brought up the jumbo and the French tank. Remember?
Spoiler
Your just annoyed I proved it’s a pretty equal punching match between the 6.0 KV-220 and the 5.7 Jumbo. Typically equal tanks are at equal brs no?
I suggest you an Noyl get your argument on the same page, you two keep moving the goal posts constantly.
I could kinda see it being 4.7, 4.3 would be a stretch.
Can you format it to those I has listed previously?
Adding details such as pen, armor, mobility, etc would be helpful.
I completely understand its armor isn’t good. But it’s not like it’s overall awful stat wise.
I showed how you are wrong about the KV-220 having 114mm armor at the front compared to a Tiger with 104mm.
Yet you haven’t even admitted that you were wrong.
That was our whole conversation. Also about how the KV-220 is practically immune against the US 75mm but for you, having more armor is apparently meaningless.
