Do I really need to screen shot it? The armor viewer literally declared frontally what I said previously.
IS-1 is the worst example, it’s not really a great tank
A super heavy tank that already faces HEAT and HEATFS should NOT go up to 8.3 so it can face APFSDS
It’s got nearly a 5.5 kd.
T-58 needs to go to 9.0 easily.
And the E100 can sit with its rival, the Is-7 which has been fighting APFSDS and HEAT for years on end.
It’s only fair.
I think you forget that the IS7 can actually move…
2 Likes
And? It’s at least 8.0 material
Where to be precise?
Slow,big,not even that good armored since you face HEAT and HEATFS,good gun and ammo with slow turret treverse,its not 8.0 material even in the slightest
So all that is the same as the IS-7, but the IS-7 is slightly more mobile.
You see the issue right? A little mobility boost doesn’t mean a whole 2 br bracket difference.
A little mobility?Have you ever even tested driving the IS7?Its insanely fast,not just “little” mobility
Is7 its a nightmare to face when its a good player using it…
I cant say the same with the E100,slow…too slow,easy kills if their team cant properly cover them
Is7 gets a DSHK or whatever its the 50 call equivalent in Russia on top making it more deadlier and versatile
Uh huh. Test driving…
Stats wise they are very similar, and the E100 performs far better than the IS-7 so that’s very telling.
The E100 is a faster Maus, with the same amount of crew, 6. One more than the IS-7.
The mobility is higher in the IS-7 but mobility, isn’t a redeeming factor for such a difference, especially given the E100 is clearly over preforming.
If you think the E100 its better than the Is7,you never played with or against them
Guess which tanks are those based on the speed
“A little bit of mobility” he said
Is7 get countless coaxes and are 14.5 which arent a joke
Has a better cannon actually,a 130mm and an autoloader
Fast af and well armored
All things that E100 doesnt have beside maybe armor
Not only that…they can still face each other since one its 7.7 and the other its 8.3…
So no,the E100 nor the Maus should go up nor down BY ANY MEANS for now…
1 Like
An auto loader that only works for 6 rnds before a very much longer reload occurs. Similar to French vehicles. making its reload spike to 35 secs
they are practically the same cannon that point is so irrelevant… if we want to get deeper into detail, the Is-7 barrel is easier to break due to the muzzle break.
Wow what a better cannon that is. lol.
In fact, the velocity is so much better on the E100, I would rule that the better cannon, because it’s like a laser beam.
Yes the IS-7 gets more machine guns. E100 gets smoke grenades.
Who said anything about the Maus? I was talking about the E100, which is vastly out preforming the IS-7 which you claim is vastly better, meaning it’s due for a nerf to 8.0 at least.
You also don’t own either tank. Guess what, neither do I, but I’ve killed vastly more IS-7s vs E100s. The E100 is quite tanky. The IS-7 can be in a full downtier.
Not that you care, but I’m doing a statistical analysis to see what brs / how well I do per match.
I set the bar kinda low. Average of 1.0 KDr higher or lower, and what br. Just to see what the vehicle on average sees, it doesn’t account for my player skill which is quite good, but data wise it will be interesting.
Which will rarely happen since i dont think youre doing run and gun
You must be ragebaiting at this point
The Is7 its literally superior to the E100 which why the Is7 its 8.3 and the E100 its 7.7
I dont have to own the tank to say that the one its vastly superior
Shoot better then
4 Likes
I don’t think the E-100 is worthy of a higher BR, considering that it’s a slightly faster Maus, and it certainly isn’t on par with an IS-7 which has a better reload, round, and is much more mobile. The IS-7 even has good armour, even against early APDS/HEAT-FS too. Even side on the IS-7 is better armoured if its hull down.
It’s 25 seconds to replenish one round.
The IS-7 one shots anything it can pen, while the E-100 can’t if it uses it’s highest penning round.
In no world is a tank with better firepower, mobility, and equivalent armour worthy of being the same BR as one that is worse.
1 Like
Guys I would like to remind everyone that you’re to debate the topic not the user !
2 Likes
Strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
i really don’t understand the 9.0
i don’t believe it can be compared to tank like OF40 mk2, X803, M60 TTS, Leo A1, Class 3 P, 279, chiftain900, the Chinese 9.0 gen 2 thermal gang other of the biggest offender of 9.0 the TAM
or be betther than the JAPZ.K A2 / and the SK-105 A2 that are 8.7 but have more tech (gen 2 thermal, drone, spotting, a turret ; ), and even a better round) with the same fire rate
the fact of the transmission always breaking while receiving shot no armor against APFSDS you’re dead if you get hit and at 30 degree sideways you can’t aim (even more hull aim is already a tragedy by itself) really compromise its performance and usability
3 Likes
Its a tank used mainly to snipe people (How its modeled i mean)
If youre across the map im telling you,APFSDS wont go through the armor,loses too much speed and pen
I know cause i tried to snipe a Strv 103 in my MBT70 and after 3 shots of non pen,i just moved on and ignored that guy
1 Like
definitely not one of the best APFSDS examples out there
who owns an E100? and is it common enough for the average player to know how to deal with it?
…no the IS7 is objectivley superior
the E100 we have in game is a hell of a lot more mobile than the maus but is still (incorrectly) using a maus turret, which is easy pickings for a strong chunk of 7.7 vehicles already, shooting the hull is stupid if you can pen it or not so putting it to a BR where it will see DM63 darts is really damn stupid.
8.0 would be really unfair for it too from the uptier compression but it should be above the maus.
Spoiler
Honestly i think the maus would be fine going to 7.3
4 Likes
with the Strv 103 you cant face top tier APFSDS tho,so why lower the br of that vehicle
1 Like