Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

I directly mentioned the F-86 and F-104, however it’s the same for most rank 5s.

Out of these 19 planes from 7.0-9.0, 18 can carry A2G ordinance.

Out of those 18, three have ballistics computers, and three have bomb sights (which are highly inaccurate at high speeds).

Out of 18 planes that can carry A2G ordinance, 15 have basically no way to deal with radar SPAA, including multiple ground attack aircraft.

In the specific example of the Harrier, it only has 5 hardpoints, so taking 9Gs limits you to only a few zunis or HVARs plus a single 500lb bomb. Considering its atrocious turnrate and heat signature, and its limited payload, I doubt it would cause much issue.

Of course, if it does, it can always just be raised.

I’m not gonna complain that the enemy team has a way to kill me if I use a OP spot or tank. I’ve gotten near 20 kill games in the Kv-7 that were only halted because someone had CAS.

I had a video of it at some point, however Fim-92s have no trouble locking onto a pre-flaring Harrier with its engine off.

If the strongest CAS get moved up along with the Gepards, then all that will be left at 8.3 is either planes with terrible payloads (like the F-86) or planes with terrible flight performance (like the F3D). Aside from facing vehicles 40 years more advanced, 7.0-8.0 planes also just don’t have really good payload options.

America was still using Skyraiders into the Vietnam war.

So, higher than the actual Abrams on an actual Abrams hull?

I mean, it’s got top tier abrams turret armor, reload, and the shell.

It’s just lacking in hull elements.

In a hull down position it’s practically invincible

Ok and? Vehicles are a list of pros and cons, glance at their cons to find out why they are 10.3 and 10.7

1 Like

panther has transmission taken out via cupola shots from 40mm aphe so thats not true

Well they are afoul then, for ppl using it and ppl fighting it. It shouldn’t get M829A1 dart, and stay at 10.3 bc 468mm of pen is enough to lol pen almost any vehicle center mass.

Why should it be nerfed when its not overperforming. Being able to pen things does not make a vehicle overpowered by default. The 120S has maus speed and you do not do anything in it other than camp hull down sniping positions

dont know what you mean by this

1 Like

It’s bad for ppl playing it and fighting against it.

historically, shermen shot panthers with HE to really fuck up the electronics, but true, they also have a pimple to pop

so according to you the conqueror should be moved up because it has more pen than this?

Maybe you should focus on actually learning to play the game instead of focusing on game balance of vehicles you have never played.

1 Like

I would honestly move the 7.7 heavy’s up to 8.0 so they didn’t face ww2 vehicles. but the 140mm of ben @60 and the spall isn’t great. Survived 2 shots from a conqueror in leo 1 in the same vehicle. but I never survived from a 120S in T-80UD, BMP-2M, L1A5, L1A1.

Top 5 in almost every game. Huh never knew I was trash 🤣.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

How, its good at what it does and it isnt overpowered

All the tigers and panthers now lose their transmission to literally any aphe pen from any caliber, its crazy

But why would you play them at 8.0 if you move nothing else

1 Like

lower the conqueror so I get to bully tiger 2 players in it more often

A. historically accurate german heavy transmissions
B. god I wish the sherman could pen a panther’s cupola with the 75

I’m reiterating this. There is literally zero reason for the first 2 chieftains to be this high

Fair enough, It’s not a perfect solution ether. There should be limits to what each tank can face instead of the 1br up or down. like tiger 2s should be +0.3 and -0.7 instead of +1 & -1.

actually tiger 2s should be +1.3 because tiger 2 players deserve it

1 Like

So in your opinion, you think tiger 2s should be fighting L1s, Chieftains, M48, M60s? Which have more armor, faster, stronger ammo and better sights?