Correct. If they get to bully people in downtiers against things that have to aim more than them to do anything to them frontally, they also get to experience what that’s like.
that why I said -0.7 so they would be facing jumbos and hell cats at the max down tier.
both of these things need to aim more than the T2 to do anything to it frontally, and america isn’t the only tech tree in the game contrary to your own belief
Rude. Russia 6.0? not really any vehicles. Same thing for japan. Aka the nations that are in almost every game at ww2 range. And so? It’s an up tier for them it’s like saying oh T14 is unbalanced bc it gets to fight t-34s
That’s not helping anything. That would make it more broken.
Except the T14 is unbalanced. It’s overpowered. T-34-76s being mid as fuck has nothing to do with the T14 being overpowered.
I couldn’t care less about the experiences of tiger 2 players. They chose to play their wonder waffle and now they get to experience what I did.
Okay excellent 120S should be at 11.7.
where did this vehicle even enter the conversation
Lmao
Yeah you really are inexperienced/bad.
There is a very good and obvious reason why the 120S is 10.3. Sure it could be moved to 10.7, but it’s not really causing major problems at 10.3.
AFAIK
Russia: Kv-220 and T-V
Japan: Heavy Tank no.6 (honestly this should be a 5.7)
1 Like
Should I ask him about the IS3? (October 1944 production date)
1 Like
German event KV-1B 4.3BR–>4.7BR
This would put it on par with the Swedish premium.
I think it’s slightly better than the Swedish premium.
Thoughts?
Spookston did a video on the Russian 6.0 line up recently. He went into it thinking it would be OP and it seemed pretty average for him. I don’t think it’s OP. He uses those two 6.0’s and a 5.0 attack aircraft.
Other than those just the su100 and is2, which are far from being op
Although I agree it’s better than the KV-1E merely for the fact that it doesn’t face as many high power cannons as the 1E… I’m not sure it would survive 4.7 they’re not doing all that great at 4.3 last I checked.
Swed KV-1 has the better turret though.
Yeah but YouTubers… they only take their best clips, and not their worst.
6.0 USSR is almost always 6.7 / 7.0
Japan 6.0 can commonly be 6.3 / 6.7 at least.
Su-100… is usable…
IS-2 is honestly a dumpster fire due to reload rates.
I can’t recall where it was, but 5-6 months ago I read documentation in regards to firing trails for the Is-2 with the fastest loader loading in 16.8~ seconds
No way gaijin would ever buff it to that, but a 18.0 sec reload feels more than fair imo.
I would put a bug report in… but…
It already took me 5 years to get the T80’s reloads buffed to 6.0 secs. Even with TONS of documentation
In a way sure, still the Jagdpanzer is just so much better than that.
The one thing I’ve learned in WT that makes any tank great;
A good shell
A good reload
Legitimately nothing else matters.
Sure they could matter but the M18 for example has speed and no armor, great to flank with a decent gun / reload.
But then if you take the abrams for example. 5.0 sec reload and a good shell means you can usually crack another shot out before an enemy can push the corner after you killed the first one.
The Swedish premium is the better vehicle, but the German KV-1E has better matchmaking.
Ah, maybe that’s why it feels better. It’s a better in its own bracket than the Swedish one is in it’s own bracket.
Premiums? so not every single person playing that range has it.