Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

VK is well protected for a 5.0 medium, but it is vulnerable from the front to many 5.0 vehicles it can face.

Using protection analysis, here’s a snippet of vehicles that can pen it from the front, and the protection VK offers vs their shell at 500m

KV-85
= 95 vs mantle
= 86-95 vs UFP

Sherman Firefly
= 94 vs mantle
= 118-122 vs UFP

M4A1 (76)
= 94 vs mantle
= 118-120 vs UFP

Chi-To-Late
= 94 vs mantle
= 114-118 vs UFP

Object 211
= 94 vs mantle
= 113-124 vs UFP

M4A4 SA-50
= 94 vs mantle
= 114-119 vs UFP

Strv m/42
= 94 vs mantle
= 121-127 UFP (strv fails at 127mm on VK UFP)

1 Like

I think it can be quite oppressive in a full downtier, but it becomes trivial at higher BRs, where turret mantlet is extremely weak, hull armour is unreliable, and turret rotation speed doesn’t help at all with that.
At that point, I’d rather play the M4A1 (76) or KV-85.

The penetration for the round, top speed, and smoke grenades are still quite nice, though.

1 Like

M62 also seemingly has good angle pen despite its stats saying otherwise.

Eh.
Su-85M not really. It’s a case mate.

KV-1C sure, it combines good armor with a good gun, leading to a deadly combo.

KV-85 I still don’t think is good enough to warrant a 5.3 br quite yet.

It’s not a deflection lol. What does the post say? Ground Realistic.
Unless Stona changed it.

Anyways, no I don’t play ground assault, it’s a waste of time and effort. It doesn’t net you much.

Got shot by a lot of tanks that should’ve killed me, and didn’t hurt me at all. And these were just the ones I recorded.

Oh I was scrolling through my old YouTube vids and found this too:

Kindly point out where I used Arcade statistics or references.

What I did use was…

  • Global Realistic statistics from statshark
  • protection analysis
  • your 20 + 69 Realistic Ground battles

You didn’t use arcade stats.

I was saying most of your experience comes from arcade though. Does it not?

Also I enjoy the disregard of the VK30 living much more than it should

1 Like

XM 249 should be at 9.3. ZA-35 should be at 9.0. Geopard can stay at 8.3. Wiesel and Luchs need to be at least at 7.0 and get a drone. ZSU-57 needs to be at least at 7.3.

Suprise suprise, even more german main cope.

3 Likes

How about we just fix the small-caliber APHE spam that makes them OP in the first place?
Then you don’t have to move up SPAAs that get countered by things like bullpups and laser-guided weaponry, which are plentiful at 9.0+.

3 Likes

VK is basically a casemate considering its turret rotation speed is so abysmal.

If you get transmissioned / engined, you aren’t going to turn the turret on time to shoot them in a lot of cases.

The only real difference being that the VK can set up its gun on its side (though that isn’t really useful when you’d usually want your gun facing hull-front anyways). It wouls technically have better horizontal guidance than the Su-85M though.

But the Su-85M has much better armour (~180mm UFP armour, with a cupola that can’t be exploited, arguably better round (for the BR), faster reload, much more usable reverse speed and slightly better acceleration.

The VK.3002 gets much better flat pen, much better gun depression, better turret guidance access to smoke grenades, and is more survivable when shot (unless the round pens the UFP / side).

I’d say its a sidegrade.

Indeed.

It’s definitely one of the best 5.0 though. But I agree that it may be reasonable at 5.0.
Though is it really fair that it is 0.7 BR different to the IS-1?

So One is Geopard that can survive being 35mm by others. and the other can go really fast. And Geopard can be .50 cal to death. So fair right?

Having the XM248 a full 1.0 BR higher and the Za-35 0.7 BR higher than the Gepard is indeed German main cope yes.

Can you argue that the XM248 and Za-35 are better against ground targets due to the things you mentioned? Technically yes, but they wouldn’t be better enough to justify those BR differences.

1 Like

0.3 BR at most… which is already reflected by their BRs [8.3 and 8.7 respectively].

2 Likes

You can use 35mm APDS to kill XM246.

1 Like

Yes but if you have time to reload to apds then you could kill it with APHE.

XM249 can tank shots and it’s hull makes it that you need to aim for weak points to one shot it with the 35. And it can tank MBT’s shots to unlike other vehicles. And being 12.7 proof makes it better then the Geopard which isn’t.

A burst to the turret kills or cripples it regardless.

It’s an M48 hull, most 8.0+ MBTs can and will just lolpen that.

The Gepard has other advantages.

The Gepard isn’t on par with the XM248, but that is perfectly reflected by the 0.4 BR differences.

1 Like

Easiest solution is just only give them all default belts.

1 Like

Only takes half a second to switch belts iirc.

1 Like