I think Leo a1a1 going to 8.7 is straight bs. The T-62/Tiran 6 are way inferior in every way other than armor.
Also the m48’s are the only one getting a 6sec reload aced. Like why not buff the reload on the T-95E1? It has no stabilizer, a 90mm cannon with 8.5sec reload aced and a bad apfsds with bad pen and it having higher chance of bouncing on highly angled armor.
Well, i used to be a US main, but since im not it any more and i dont main a single nation, i can say this BR changes seems like “lets make US trash”. Ill just play germany or russia, idc anymore tbh
I think the A1A1 is fine at 8.7, but the T-62 / Tiran 6 should go down too.
The T-62 / Tiran 6 is arguably a side-graded to the T-55A.
As for the T95E1, I agree. It should probably have a 6.7s or 7.5s reload if it stays at 8.3, or it should have stayed at 8.0.
The T26E5 should’ve went up after they decompress the 7.0 - 7.7 BR range with other 6.7s like the Tiger IIs and (arguably) the M26E1.
Yes, the 1A5s were fine at 9.3. It’s just below average compared to the best 9.3s.
They should just move up all the great 9.3s to 9.7 (it’s not like there’s a bunch of 9.7s anyway) and keep the 1A5 at 9.3.
I agre with u, but this is gaijin, the last 3 br changes they made just messed the balance more and more, idk what they are trying to do tbh
Or better yet, we decompress instead of recompressing the area we just got decompressed some months ago
I’ve made my opinion on the VII very clear, it’s a good and very strong tank but it’s not uniquely strong for 4.7. It’s extremely map dependent, extremely matchup dependent, and almost worthless into uptiers against Germany thanks to the panther and VK being perfect counters. For every 10 kill game I get on north holland, there are like 4 where I get 0 kills on Volokolamsk. It’s not hard to kill (any remotely intelligent Chaffee player dunks on you so hard it’s not even funny) and not hard to avoid either. It has to W+M1 into the enemy because it doesn’t have the mobility to do anything else.
How about it’s armor vs 5.3 vehicles.
And is there ANY 5.3 vehicles that can survive a hit from the 128mm?
Kills per spawn = 1.04
Kills per death = 1.30
Seems to be fine at 6.7
I mean, I’m fine with that.
But you’d need to decompress the whole of 9.0+ if you want to make sure nothing gets compressed.
I had shermans survive 128mm in my sturm emil, jagdtiger would be a problem to face but it has the weak spot and it can get immobilized easily, so I don’t see a problem here.
You know very well that reload rates are what gaijin uses for balancing.
And historically it would be about 6.7 seconds for the turret stowage ammo, and about 10 seconds for the ammo located in the floor.
Well maybe you had a poor shot. Deflections can happen no matter what gun is being used if the angle is bad.
9 times out of 10 the Sherman does not survive, assuming you are not aiming at a crazy angled part of the tank.
Your example of a one-off survival (with a different gun by the way) in no way justifies lowering the Jagdtiger as suggested.
I fucking hate the flakbus. Genuinely the most annoying fucking thing to play against. It’s not overpowered, it’s not broken, it’s not unbalanced, it’s annoying and the people who play it KNOW it’s annoying. They’re always the motorcycle girl ochevkin senrai pfps with bushes all over their stuff.
KV-1 (Zis 5) to 5.3
Only 1 step below a Jumbo and higher than KV-85?
LOL.
We all know the Tiger 2s have to be 5.0 (Nr 1~50), 5.3 (nr 51+, diesel tiger 2) and 5.7 (105) to be balanced /lie
KV-85 doesn’t bounce a 17 pounder to the LFP for no reason :)
That is some awful shooting lmao. Were you shooting on the move?
Any data make a fact: Leopard2 not strongest top tank
