The Conqueror literally doesn’t deserve 8.0 at all. Sure, it’s a fully stabilized 120, but it’s shooting early APDS. I have bounced on the stage right unangled turret cheek of a maus, aka the part you’re supposed to shoot. It doesn’t have a usable HE round thanks to the state of HESH, and it has a 15 second reload rate. Gun Depression is also a problem. The Conqueror is a good tank and I love it, but it’s a very flawed tank. And I’m not even mentioning the state of the matchmaker and how it’s almost all uptiers because that’s not exactly a fair thing to point out when discussing viability, but the conqueror REALLY hates uptiers (except for literally just pradesh).
It handles uptiers much better than other 7.7 heavies due to it’s stab.
1 Like
i finally got the conqueror after a long time, i mostly use it in sim but i have one thing to say
its not 8.0 material, the armor is overrated the shell a lot of time doesn’t do any damage the reload is long and the mobility mid to bad
TL;DR
Lmao calls me dishonest, but nothing of what I have said has been dishonest. If you really al want to put the “dishonest” label on anyone, it’s you. You’re putting words in my mouth now.
I said he was initially into the “Russian bias” trend, stopped for a bit, and has restarted that trend.
Spookston vids that literally have thumbnails with higher kills, or something claiming bias:
Newest to oldest:
These are just the last 5 months… I could go on and on.
And he may sometimes makes somewhat similar titles / thumbnails, but typically not to the same degree as he does with the Russian vehicles.
But most people I kill, when playing a Russian tank, scream “Russian bias!?!?!” In global chat. No matter the br.
Your very much underselling the USA fleet.
Purposely not showing the context is being dishonest. The video you linked doesn’t prove that he didn’t hop on the russian bias bandwagon. it’s of him addressing russian bias which he clearly states that he doesn’t believe in it.
If you disagree with that, I highly suggest you use the “ask gemini” button and ask it questions in your native language. Or extract the transcript it put it in a LLM of your choosing.
Maybe watch his videos?
He does that for every vehicle he plays… It’s not exclusive to Russian vehicles as you have suggested with your cherry picked examples. For every russian thumbnail you show, I can show one that has a different nation.
And? would it mean anything if I say that rarely has happened to me? that statement means nothing
3 Likes
I do disagree. I posted the video for a reason. That was his opinion 5-6 years ago.
And the context is that video, how are your denying his own CC quotes?
And nothing was cherry picked. That’s a strawman argument, since I took all his Russian vehicles vids over the last x amount of months.
I think your just a contrarian at this point.
I disagree with the german changes except Leopard 12.3 > 12.0. One thing I would change is moving tiger E down to 5.7 as the smaller cupola doesn’t mean it should be facing stronger vehicles as its armor is basically identical.
That just spits in the face of the heavy tank no.6
And Tiger IIs are the 2nd best 6.7s in the game.
The context of him saying that he doesn’t believe in russian bias? lol
you should probably look up the definition of a strawman argument because that’s not what’s happening here.
You showing Spookston’s thumbnails of russian tanks as if it’s some gotcha when it clearly isn’t. It doesn’t prove anything because he does that for almost every vehicle he plays
I guess pointing out you lies makes me a contrarian lol
1 Like
No, you’re exactly pulling a strawman.
Your distorting what I have posted to fit your argument against the fact that he did say:
And his thumbnails are only part of it, if you actually read the titles, and watch his videos he makes comments that any sane person would assume he has a bias against russia.
But moving it up .3 isn’t great because it would be fighting early cold war tanks and would face 7.7 heavy tanks every other match.
M-51 should be at 7.0 because it has an extremely good shell for 6.3.
It has 0 problem fighting them.
It will be aiming at weak spots while they could pen it every where. Plus the turret armor is is a weak spot.
Back when I was starting the game, the idea of Russian bias is something I actually believed in. During that time, I was mostly playing the German tree and T-34s seemed blatantly overpowered. They were mobile, their armor was effective, and their cannons pretty much always one-shot. I even made a video playing the T-34 to show off how supposedly broken it was. Of course, the more I played the game, the more I realized it was my lack of skill—not the developer’s national origin—which was having an impact.
Him first playing warthunder doesn’t equate to the start of his youtube career/growth.
You’re conflating the two to falsely prove that he did jump on the russian bias bandwagon. He didn’t. He didn’t “stop for a bit” because it never was there to begin with. And he hasn’t restarted that trend because he never posted those type of content to begin with.
Unless you want to argue that his beliefs have stayed the same for 10+ years ago, therefore his content has anti-russian agendas then it’s a pointless argument to make. Judge him on the content he makes, not on a belief he once had more than a decade ago
Been watching him for almost like 6 years, he doesn’t. Neither his title, thumbnails or content sound like he has a bias against russia.
Again if you watched his discussion videos it’s very clear that this is the case.
3 Likes
I think it’s fair to say I’ve acquired enough experience over the years to provide a decent comparative assessment of the qualities of US and Soviet ships:
3 Likes
Good grief. Thats a lot of naval.
2 Likes
I would like to add that the Leopard 1A1 and 1A5 should be 0.3 brs lower because there armor only protects them from light mgs and there mobility isn’t that great compared to there counter parts especially when you look at their armor.