Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

They both have some really trolly armor though.

If the armor was fixed to be more consistent, and actually not over preform like it commonly does, then yes

The 7.5 secs one could stay at 9.3 if it’s fixed.

1 Like

Yeah but there’s more than a few that can function on one crew in game.

Well, yes. I’m aware, and I’d imagine that capability has been factored into their current BR placements already.
But it hasn’t yet for the MBT/Kpz 70 due to it not being implemented. So where would they be moved to, if moved at all, if this report is addressed?

2 Likes

Well it would make one-shotting it a bit more difficult, but most lol-pen rounds like DM33 (which starts to become really common at 9.3 and 9.7) can just ammo rack them anyways.
It would definitely boost their survivability by a decent degree, so I’d say the KPZ-70 would 100% be 9.7 (since it’s already on the border of being overpowered at 9.3), and the MBT-70 would then be good at 9.3.

Yeah the 4.3 / 4.7 KV-1s are a nightmare, though the Churchill VII is almost as much of a nightmare for them too 😅

If they just fixed the trolly breach then it would honestly be fine how they are.
Maybe have their 20mm ammunition box knock out the vehicle when exploded too, just like how I’d like to see the same with the Leopard 2K.

Thanks to the turret roof, they have a WAY more consistent way of penning me than I do of penning them!

1 Like

It’s not even just the breech, tandem ATGMs, some early darts, etc.

Shooting the hull, has its own issues.

Yeh,thats kinda sussy xd

Ayo, why Albatros is at 7.3 with balistic computer and 76 hydras? I was about to win a match but 2 dudes with albatros started to destroy my entire team, and they did it, the small amount of enemies on the ground managed to capture the point since there were not enough team mates to fight back,also,me and some other team mates tried to shot down the albatros but it was too hard because it was sniping us with the rockets, what was gaijin thinking??

2 Likes

Ive got a great idea - Move every single tank +1br and leave Russian tanks where they are.!!!

I mean come on - not like they are OP at their BRs is it mwahgahhahahaha

1 Like

russian tanks would be fine if it wasnt their broken damage model. You can clearly see that they have reduced spall and their modules eat spalls.

A russian tank would never die to a shot like this: Imgur: The magic of the Internet

2 Likes

I rest my case.! Why fix something they apparently don’t want to fix…??

1 Like

There isn’t anything wrong with them… you guys are literally making up nonsense to justify a skill issue.

Why are you like this? If you’re going to play the “favoritism” card, a lot of the Russian nerfs were already implemented, and therefore removed.

And if I have any bias, I’d much rather see Italy prosper

Even big youtubers such as BPA jon and spookston complain about russians DM, but a random guy that play on console and play russia 90% of the time said: “they are fine”.

Boy, if you only play russia, of course you gonna think nothing is wrong with them… Thats the definition of bubble opinion


3 Likes

Any person who scroll your most played vehicles gonna realize you mostly play russia. I seen your first 3 pages and the best you have in other nations is some mid-BRs premiums

3 Likes

They benefit the most from fuel tanks absorbing all spall, and not having any turret baskets.
Apart from those, Top Tier USSR / Russian vehicles are quite mediocre.

1 Like

It’s a weird case. Incredibly potent due to the stabilizer, but due to the APDS a lot of the meh players can’t realize that potential.

1 Like

15 seconds reload on aced crew. Just play centurion with 6.3 reload and -10 gun depression and not -7. Same br, both have stab.

1 Like

I hate the 7.7 centurion gun, nether has the pen or the punch.

1 Like