I’d like to push back a little but on the bad shell argument. The conqueror’s shell is finnicky, sure, but it’s very good. Gaijin absolutely needs to fix it, but it’s not at all bad.
you’re just wrong. I absolutely adore the conqueror but god this thing is easy to kill. It has the requisite stabilized british tank godawful ammo layout
(seriously why is this ammo rack the primary one)
and a bigass door on the front of the turret .
Again, I love the conqueror, I love playing the conqueror, but it’s not REMOTELY good enough to justify going to 8.0. A 15 second reload in the land of ~7 second 105 reloads is just inherently going to kill the viability this thing has.
no idea what the rest of your post was getting at…
But in terms of reload, the IS-2/3/4/6 all reload the slowest, and yet are the same BR as things like the KT, or the Conquerer, T32E1, etc etc.
But unlike the Conquerer which gets HEAT-FS and atgm protection, those Soviet ones get pierced once and tend to explode thanks to gaijin for putting the ammo literally all over in the tank for no reason.
The armor is not as good as you think it is and you unironically lose any engagement to a heat-fs vehicle if they can see your lower front plate thanks to the ammo layout being like that. The add-on armor is only heat-fs protection against bad players and atgm players will just go for the big ass forehead door anyway.
I’m not calling the conqueror bad. I think it’s a very good tank. It’s also a very flawed tank. The flaws more than make up for the genuinely excellent upsides and 7.7 is exactly where it should be (also gaijin please make the round more consistent I’ve bounced on an unangled maus turret cheek exactly where I’m supposed to shoot it to get the gunner)
also do not perceive my stats with the conqueror my KD does not remotely reflect how much I love playing it.
Well informed does not necessarily mean correct. Especially when you’re downplaying the very real downsides the conqueror has and overplaying the upsides. The conqueror is perfectly fine at 7.7 and would be made substantially worse by a BR increase.