me too but sometimes they forget to do damage
you’re just wrong. I absolutely adore the conqueror but god this thing is easy to kill. It has the requisite stabilized british tank godawful ammo layout
(seriously why is this ammo rack the primary one)
and a bigass door on the front of the turret
.
Again, I love the conqueror, I love playing the conqueror, but it’s not REMOTELY good enough to justify going to 8.0. A 15 second reload in the land of ~7 second 105 reloads is just inherently going to kill the viability this thing has.
I don’t generally use bushes myself. I hate people that do.
I avoid playing my 220 despite me liking the tank… because all I ever get are 6.7 or 7.0 matches and a KT makes me go back to the hanger instantly.
Lastly, if the KV-220 has to aim at you to fire, then you can always shoot the breech… nothing to do with luck.
me too
but still you have a pretty good k/d on it
no idea what the rest of your post was getting at…
But in terms of reload, the IS-2/3/4/6 all reload the slowest, and yet are the same BR as things like the KT, or the Conquerer, T32E1, etc etc.
But unlike the Conquerer which gets HEAT-FS and atgm protection, those Soviet ones get pierced once and tend to explode thanks to gaijin for putting the ammo literally all over in the tank for no reason.
Yes I have a good KDr in it, because I only play it in 6.3 or 6.0 matches.
If it’s 6.7 or above, I generally spawn my T-V panther in as it’s gun is still usable at those brs.
The armor is not as good as you think it is and you unironically lose any engagement to a heat-fs vehicle if they can see your lower front plate thanks to the ammo layout being like that. The add-on armor is only heat-fs protection against bad players and atgm players will just go for the big ass forehead door anyway.
I’ve had people shoot me there too. Still lived it.
You can see on statshark I boast a 3.30 KDr in it. It’s not bad by any means.
I’m not calling the conqueror bad. I think it’s a very good tank. It’s also a very flawed tank. The flaws more than make up for the genuinely excellent upsides and 7.7 is exactly where it should be (also gaijin please make the round more consistent I’ve bounced on an unangled maus turret cheek exactly where I’m supposed to shoot it to get the gunner)
also do not perceive my stats with the conqueror my KD does not remotely reflect how much I love playing it.
Also, I hate to high horse, but you barely have 4k matches, I have 18k matches and a good KDr…
So, I think I would have a well informed idea of where vehicles should be no?
Well informed does not necessarily mean correct. Especially when you’re downplaying the very real downsides the conqueror has and overplaying the upsides. The conqueror is perfectly fine at 7.7 and would be made substantially worse by a BR increase.
Like I said - it depends on how you would use it. I find it hard to believe you would pick a Cromwell over the Sherman in a CQC map.
It’s very slow and has poor hull armor. The thing is very map dependent - if it can’t go hull down it won’t be able to defend itself.
As for stabilizer - as a heavy tank with long reload, the stabilizer does not make a huge difference. It’s not like the tank will be flying around corners and shooting. Heavy tanks like the Tiger 2 do fine without a stabilizer.
I am correct though, and my stats prove it.
Your opinion is based on your point of view and bias.
I act without bias.
Indeed. It absolutely does not need to go to 8.0:
FV214 Conqueror should not have a Stabiliser
1 Like
Until they remove the incorrect stab, it should 100% be 8.0
All other Stabilized tanks are generally 8.0 except things like the M551(76)
Id love to know what universe we live in where we think the conqueror of all things should go up in br
Because why should i, has 0 impact on my life
It must. 10k more matches than me.
2 less years in the game than me.
And you quite literally came in here and said:
And I explained it to you, now your getting in a tisy over it.
You’re entire argument is “it has stab” then you pulled up something completely irrelevant
Simple my original statement may be, but most people understand easily why it could be an 8.0. (And should)
But “it has a stab” was never my argument.
Do you need me to go vastly in depth for you?