Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

Like I said - it depends on how you would use it. I find it hard to believe you would pick a Cromwell over the Sherman in a CQC map.

It’s very slow and has poor hull armor. The thing is very map dependent - if it can’t go hull down it won’t be able to defend itself.

As for stabilizer - as a heavy tank with long reload, the stabilizer does not make a huge difference. It’s not like the tank will be flying around corners and shooting. Heavy tanks like the Tiger 2 do fine without a stabilizer.

I am correct though, and my stats prove it.

Your opinion is based on your point of view and bias.

I act without bias.

Indeed. It absolutely does not need to go to 8.0:
FV214 Conqueror should not have a Stabiliser

1 Like

Until they remove the incorrect stab, it should 100% be 8.0

All other Stabilized tanks are generally 8.0 except things like the M551(76)

Id love to know what universe we live in where we think the conqueror of all things should go up in br

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Because why should i, has 0 impact on my life

It must. 10k more matches than me.

2 less years in the game than me.

And you quite literally came in here and said:

And I explained it to you, now your getting in a tisy over it.

You’re entire argument is “it has stab” then you pulled up something completely irrelevant

Simple my original statement may be, but most people understand easily why it could be an 8.0. (And should)

But “it has a stab” was never my argument.

Do you need me to go vastly in depth for you?

Yet even more people think it should stay where it is, you say im the one having a tizy im not the one getting defensive whenever someone brings up something i disagree with

I’m being defensive… by proving you wrong?

That’s a weird way to take it, but if that’s how you decided to take it so be it.

Debate is not defensive. A lot of people “question” why I put X vehicles where. And I explain it more in depth sometimes.

Like I said previously, if the fake stabilizer is removed, then there is no reason to move it to 8.0

If your idea of proof is someones stats id go to a library to read up on definitions

You don’t think it’s odd, out of all my 7.7 tanks…

The Caernarvon and Conquerer are the best?

That doesn’t strike you as odd in the slightest?

It’s also the only 7.7 heavy that is stab’d and has nearly 500 pen at 100 meters.

Clearly not good XD

Oh, and I love the thumbs down on my Statshark page, show me your bitter without telling me. Is that genuinely a way to act as an adult?

I will wear it like a badge of honor!

Sherman II can also reverse, as well as every else QTip said. The stabilizer itself is already a massive bonus.

2 Likes

As I see it, it’s not really any harder for Gajin to remove the stab than it is from them to change the BR (if not even easier), so it makes more sense in my mind to to just advocate for the removal of the ahistorical feature. If we get it moved to 8.0 instead, that just makes the process for correcting the Conqueror more complicated. BR changes should not happen in a vaccum where bug reports on the vehicle are ignored.

5 Likes

Nope

1 Like

Great argument. However, I have just grinded the entire Japanese tech tree except for the Rank 8 tanks. Japan has many over-tiered tanks, especially in the 6–7 BR range.