Yes ideally a 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 be system would be ideal…
But all I’m saying is the VK is worse than the KV-1B when it comes to seal clubbing and many many people despised that tank.
But because of stats and the vast majority of Vk players just holding W it’s a bad vehicle? No.
The VK is pretty good all things considered.
When I play it, I typically only die if I get 3v1’d or more.
while i do love both the m47 and ru251, having your lineup where the base non discounted cost is 100 usd, is not practical, and even then those are your only real vehicles, the weisel and luchs are both meme machines that cant do much.
also for the man panther, youre forgetting the poor side armour. you know a very critical weak spot for early panthers. its like not bringing up the jumbo’s lower side plate as being a weakspot, doing so is just a disservice for your own argument.
I just noticed the KV-1E just does not get the BR-350SP APBC round of the KV-1 (L-11) for whatever reason. Wouldn’t be a huge pen boost over BR-350B, but I see no harm in adding that round so that it has one more potential option against better armored vehicles.
Yeah, I can agree that the IS-2’s are a bit overtiered, especially the model '44. Gajin really wanted to make the IS-2 an analogue to the Tiger II imo, when they just aren’t comparable. I’m fine with them going down, but remove the BR-471D round from the '44. It’s a 50’s round anyways that would be better if saved for the IS-2M to make it more distinct from the WW2 versions.
The Churchill VII is worse than the III imho. The extra armor is not worth using the british 75, and that armor barely matters when almost every proper tank you see can just kill you frontally anyway through the tracks.
after a weak i saw again a kv220, it was a down tier and he got 8 kills before dying(+assists ,cap) , so i don’t thing it needs anything, no br reduction no reload buff because it already destroys the 5.0, you cant believe it will be balanced if it faces 4.7