Why on earth isn’t the BMPT/72 on the list? Those things shouldn’t even be in the game to begin with, let alone 11.3. I think I have played less than 30 games between 10.3 and 12.0 since those monsters came out. Not kidding.
BMPT 11.3 > 12.7 (People tend to argue that its armament isn’t “top tier worthy”. Such is most definitely not the case. The 30mm canons have cracked accuracy compared to irl. This leads to the BMPT able to neutralize completely 3 or even 4 MBTs in 5/6 seconds or less. And of course, anything that the canons aren’t killing fast enough for your taste can be hit with missiles. The in-game model has an absurd number of little tiny individual armor pieces and modules which make its survivability virtually unrivaled. The raw armor is quite good. The hull-down abilities of the tank surpass things like the M901. You can’t kill in that position. When your ammo gets cooked off, the ammo crates allow for easy replenishment (Unlike any NATO IFV). Its also classified as a TD. This makes it cheap to spawn in. Even in a full down-tier its almost as cheap as a up-tiered MBT.)
BMPT-72 11.3 > 12.3 (For the same reasons as the BMPT. The BR has to be lower simply because its a premium and that’s about the only reason. The reduced crew number does do a little to decrease the survivability but no by much.)
In my opinion, these changes must happen with the next BR changes. These tanks are ruining over a fifth of Warthunder’s ground BR brackets.
4 Likes
first of all you need to fix it itself, why can you have both 30mm fire APDS while irl only one can? first change is to make only one belt APDS and the 30mm will fire at the same time so the ammo will decrease from 900 APDS to 450 APDS and 450 APHE/HE that will fire at the same time, also remove the ammo box, and lastly make it when you ammo rack it blow up or at least destroy everything at the turret, then it can stay at 11.3
1 Like
Well, the tech tree BMPT also gets HE-TF, a better LFP, (arguably) better hull, and extra ERA side armour.
Needless to say, the tech tree BMPT is a lot better than the premium variant.
1 Like
I would like to propose some br change about the M13/40 (I, II, III) for Italy, currently they are almost the same with no big change, but the I version is at 1.7, the II and the III at 2.0, I personaly think that they should all put in 1.3 or max. at 1.7, especially for their armament wich have a max. penetration of 47mm (if im not wrong) that cannot pen almost any enemy in an uptier at 3.0
pls tell me you don’t actually believe this and its a bait or something
I see only like 3.7 vehicle and the bt42, so i dont understand why he say 5.0
its a meme tank, very experience players use it, you can 0.50cal the turret its not above 1.7 tank
The Pz.IV F2 and the M4A3(105) are at 3.0
Pz IV Ausf.F2 is 3.3 not 3.0.
1 Like
oh, sry my bad
you compere a Sherman to a BT??
no, i mean that in his photo he say tht the bt42 was very strong (wich i dont blame) at 5.0 but in reality he show us a game of 3.3
1 Like
Im pretty sure that SPAAs mains exists,expecially in some br brackets cough cough 8.3 - 9.7
Many similarities but the M46 has way better armor. That would easily account for the one-step BR difference.
It’s bait, this forum is a clown show of suggestions
Someone might have already proposed this, but I really want all Sd.Kfz.234/2 to be moved to Rank 3 BR 4.0.
It’s a heartfelt plea.
So two separate moves (since 3.7 can be rank 3 - see Italy m24)…
Is it because you want to complete rank 3 missions or because it’s a bit OP for 3.7 or both?
1 Like
I don’t see how that could be accurate. It has two different belts for certain reasons, but nothing is saying it cannot simply load both full of APDS.