The Pz.IV F2 and the M4A3(105) are at 3.0
Pz IV Ausf.F2 is 3.3 not 3.0.
1 Like
oh, sry my bad
you compere a Sherman to a BT??
no, i mean that in his photo he say tht the bt42 was very strong (wich i dont blame) at 5.0 but in reality he show us a game of 3.3
1 Like
Im pretty sure that SPAAs mains exists,expecially in some br brackets cough cough 8.3 - 9.7
Many similarities but the M46 has way better armor. That would easily account for the one-step BR difference.
It’s bait, this forum is a clown show of suggestions
Someone might have already proposed this, but I really want all Sd.Kfz.234/2 to be moved to Rank 3 BR 4.0.
It’s a heartfelt plea.
So two separate moves (since 3.7 can be rank 3 - see Italy m24)…
Is it because you want to complete rank 3 missions or because it’s a bit OP for 3.7 or both?
1 Like
I don’t see how that could be accurate. It has two different belts for certain reasons, but nothing is saying it cannot simply load both full of APDS.
It’s both. And… there’s actually a third reason too.
Germany is really lacking usable light tanks between BR 4.0 and 5.7, so it’s hard to cap points or get good early positioning.
In GRB the meta is firepower + mobility + CAS.
So yeah “Blitzkrieg” really is the key to winning.
1 Like
So the solution of the German light tank problem, is removing the one and only low tier German light tank, moving it slightly higher to a br Germany doesn’t have anything else at besides a single td, instead of adding in other vehicles… What.
Also this doesn’t even bring up the fact the puma would have a higher br than the chaffee which is objectively better than the puma in every category besides raw top speed and HP/t. I mean you could change the puma to rank 3 but one of the reasons why gaijin changed along of these vehicles br at 3.7 to be rank 2 is to limit the amount of players using these vehicles during events, as for why minor nations are different, it’s likely because even during these events, there aren’t enough players to screw up the matchmaker, I remember when the m4 sherman and pz4 f2 were rank 2, oh god for the mm break during those weeks.
1 Like
It’s missing armour only compared to 1984 B’s or newly made T-80BV’s whereas game version is meant to be B kept up to the BV standart.
I think it’s more than fair given thermal, even if the thermal itself is rarely ever used.
Edit: funny how T-64BV is always 5 layer comp, our T-64B in game is 1984 so it’s best soviet armoured T-64 we can get.
T-80U got them not from export model and it has Agava-2 whereas T-80B had much worse both thermal quality and FOV wise Agava (1).
It’s no T-80UM either as that has a different entrenching equipment. It’s just T-80U with Agava-2, some that were even seen in the Russian army. In fact we even know the index from the model, and the model itself is from 1989, whereas the thermal is 1985. Index wise it would be T-80U with Object 219AS-DEI6 index. Should also lose a single round when mounting Agava 2.
IIRC also Cyprus T-80U’s were with Agava-2 before being modernised to Plisa (same thermal as on T-80U-E1)
not really named that and goes like 10 km/h more in reverse than you noted.
I don’t have issue with possibly moving the vehicle to 4.0 in GRB because it might be undertiered.
But I’m not seeing the logic part of “lack of tanks in 4.0 - 5.7”. You can use the 234/2 with your rank 3 line-up regardless of what BR is assigned - 3.7 or 4.0, it will still function the same.
Keep in mind if it gets moved to rank 3, you will have to drop down in rank 2 to make use of the P204 for missions. The lineup should no longer be using Pz4-H or DickerMax. You could use the P204 with 3.7 or 4.0 rank 2 vehicles, but it will face stronger enemies because of that.
1 Like
yea i know i don’t remember exactly but its a T80UD the tank they modify
Come on… Its way better than the KV-1B and E. Making little sense why they have the same BR placement.
1 Like
You can just look at the polls. 58% think Russia is overperforming yet you’re buffing them again. At this point im convinced Gaijin is required to present Russia as stronk by the Kremlin for propaganda purposes.
3 Likes
Ok so these arent official?
no