please dont “rate” again tiger 2 105 in 7.3? yeah face more heatfs and in uptier face 8.3 really good idea… u want is8 in 7.0 nut tiger 2 in 7.3 u are somehow russian main? because in much nations u want higher br but for russian vehicles lower…
3 Likes
The disconnect with you is real.
Why cv90 are you referring to? There’s a bunch of them. And the one I played so far, didn’t have much of a reload time if at all. So much, so that in my first game I just ran through the enemy team in a full tier and got a nuke.
And 40mm APFSDS is vastly better than 30mm APDS which constantly likes to shatter.
The 40mm can also pierce a lot more places than the 30mm.
What in the non English are you even trying to say?
If anything, all tank get affected by HEAT-FS, and that’s a poor example, as Soviet heavies all detonate with one heat FS hit, because gaijin puts the ammo literally everywhere in those tanks.
Fun fact, for the longest time, the Is-4 was one of the very very few tanks that had mg ammo modeled, which killed the tank even easier.
Oh btw, I’m an Italian main
better yet, bring in the zsu 57-2 m2. aka the wz305, with radar.
there are only 4 40mm cv90s, all of them have the same shell capacity and shell selection minus the cv9040c getting access to slpprj m/01, while having the same firepower performance because literally nothing with the gun was changed between the different versions.
as for which cv90 i selected for comparison, it was the cv9040b, which is the same br as the bmp3.
and yes the 40mm apfsds is better than the 30mm apds, however that performance doesnt offset the massive problem that is, the Swedish reload problem. also that time you played the cv90 was most likely when gaijin broke the ready rack replenishment system where it was in a usable state for auto loaders. which they fixed like 2 years ago. if youre saying its still good to this day, then youre just lying to yourself and the rest of us because no one in their right mind would say thats a reasonable replenishment rate.
Still a little confused as to why you want to move both of these up, they’re fine where they are, good gun with a good shell on a fairly mobile yet tall and vulnerable chassis. I can see the STA-3 going to 7.0 but its still going to go from a good tank to a mid pick and it will be stuck without a lineup. However, the Type 61 is just a worse M46 which is at 7.0 so it is fine at 6.7, no reason to move it up in my eyes.
I can think of plenty other tanks in the BR range that have good cannons that dont need to move up, the tank also in and of itself acts as an equalizer to more oppresive heavy tanks and heavy TDs such as Ferdinand/Jagtiger etc.
Supposedly the STA-3 could possibly be fine going to 7.0 and Type-61 staying at 6.7, but the most optimal solution would be for BR decompression.
Indeed. The more domestic Nordic vehicles, the marrier.
This does relate to a belief of mine that it’s good to consider BR changes in the context of what other vehicles aren’t in the game, but could be added. I see too many people justify unusual BRs on the grounds that changing it would breaks line-ups or creates voids in the tree. It completely ignores that ~70% of the time (a bit nation and era dependent), there’s a viable non-copy-paste vehicle that could fill the gap anyways. Just some food for thought ig.
akkor mondom magyar nyelven hatha jobban meg erted…! jah latom a profil kepeden hogy olasz main vagy… nemis ertem hogy gondoltam hogy tiger 2 7.3 ba tenni mig az is6 ot 7.0 ba… hogy aztan ha ledobja 6.0 ba mi fogja ot atutni? sok esz kellet ehez nemroszbol… na igy mar jo?