So true… there was a vote if warthunder needs daze mechanic where if penned crew would be for few seconds not responsive… it failed but snail in its infinite wisdom did the same, without any say from the comunity and just to NATO tanks…and not for few seconds but untill they repair.
2 Likes
you should leave all of that for the designated containment thread
1 Like
this is simply not true, the vote failed and thats it
2 Likes
Topic cleaned
@UniqueScorpions-live @Hetaeron Please take you personal disagreements in DMs in order to keep this topic clean and tidy.
Also just to clarify, no a user cannot delete posts or comment that aren’t their own, only moderation can do so.
Cheers,
1 Like
5s reload* and don’t forget about the fact that it has -12° of depression and a really mobile chasis
By moving ITPSV we get an entire BR of no AA for Sweden. VEAK40 is a horrendous AA becuase of bad radar, and ITPSV is basically competing with SAM launchers at that point which isn’t exactly fair. This will only make things worse, without adressing the core issue with it. To be fair, those BR changes are doing NOTHING with how absolutely BROKEN 35-mm SAP rounds are. You can uptier them all you want and they’ll still be OP as HECK. It would be cool to just remove SAP from belts entirely or replace them with APDS instead (I think SIDAM25 is a good enough example of what happens when you get a belt with no AP rounds whatsoever, poor bastard can’t even break tracks with those HE shells). I feel like 1/3 or 1/2 ratio of APDS to HE should be fine with how fast those cannons are firing. And for the love of god PLEASE give VEAK it’s HEVT back. It’s literally an anti-tank vehicle ONLY and even then it’s barely usable! Bkan is also a questionable one. You’re not fast, you have no turret, your armour is nonexistent and the only thing you have is a 3.2 second autoloader with 14 round ammorack TOTAL. If I’m being honest, last time I saw that thing in battle was… A while ago. At br LOWER we have 2S3M which I can safely say is better in most ways: it’s faster, it has a full turret, better reverse, better shell selection, higher ammo capacity… The only thing going for Bkan is it’s autoloader and that’s most often overshadowed by how easily you can be killed by a .50 cal.
And I also feel that there’s another LONG overdue thing that has to be done… Instead of lowering BR of LvKv 9040c please buff the replenishment of ready rack rate. For how “reliable” low caliber APFSDS shells are the ready rack replenishes ATROCIOUSLY slow. Also a model update would be a nice addition too.
Other than this I agree to most of these suggestions with some additions:
U-sh 204gk should get scouting, and APDS belt. Instead of moving it down BR move it to 5.7 It’ll feel WAY more comfortable, as there is more light vehicles that it can fight.
T-54 - It’s good enough. Not great, not terrible. Keep it where it is.
IS-6 Straight up better version of IS-3. Faster, more armour, better reverse, volumetric hell turret. A questionable idea to move it to 7.3.
RakJPz 2 (HOT) - unlike IT-1 it has NO armour whatsoever. Even slightes peek over the hill most definetely will result in DEATH. Also, it doesn’t have a turret.
T30 - APHE has 197mm of pen… While I wouldn’t argue this decission with T34 or T26E5, I’d keep T30 where it is. Bigger gun does not equal better gun.
Skink and generally Oerlikon 20mm armed things need a damage buff. Otherwise it’s good where it is.
All the 35mm SPAA in list - same as ITPSV at the start. Germany simply lacks a better alternative at that br range.
T-64A - Are you insane? 6s autoloader AND a decent APFSDS… That thing is staying where it is, it`s good enough.
Conquerror - I agree with br change, but APDS and HVAP needs some love generally speaking. SHELL SHATTERED
BMD doesn’t need to “unfold” the launcher, it can fire ATGM on the move, and in case of BMD-4 it reloads it in 4 goddamn seconds. It doesn’t need apfsds IN THE SLIGHTEST.
you can remove them now but at least the t80UD should get the better transmission (there is a ukrainian T80UD that can go -22kmh in reverse )
Yeah, no. That is a soviet union version of UD, they get soveiet union “No step back” gearbox.
Scorpion the guy who made this said the Veak is on par with Gepard so you’re wrong skill issue
/S
That’s fine.
Nah it’s the same radar the marksman gets, you need to go to 10.0+ for better radars. VEAK’s problem is mostly the firerate, if you’re firing less metal into the air your chances of hitting simply go down
1 Like
yea but in 10.7 without thermals is unfair at least give it good reverse speed
When did I ever say that?
While back when you said the Yennisei was worse than the Veak and then I compared the fact that they’re were nearly identical for AT role but the Yennisei was better for air.
Worse mobility on the Yennisei compared to the Veak but better AA and similar TD capabilities given Russia doesn’t fight as many armored tanks.
It may have been a bit after you said the BMP 30mm was weaker than the CV90 which was superior despite that being a lie.
That things armour is better than T-80B and that thing also doesnt get thermals.
The BMP’s 30mm is only better in ROF. Everything else goes to the cv90.
Velocity, AP ability, etc.
it gets even if it didnt have irl
one, 300m/s velocity is a noticable change, but 1120m/s is still so high you wont really notice the difference unless youre at extreme ranges.
and two, the pen of the round is pointless because its not high enough where combating mbts is easier, as such the same weakspots for a russian 30mm apds is the same as the 40mm apfsds, but also it comes with the slight problem of you have 24 rounds which last for 2 seconds of firing, and have a reload time of like 2ish minutes, maybe 3, oh and slightly better post pen damage, not enough to offset the massive firepower difference.
so ya between the swedish 40mm and soviet 30mm, the 30mm is gonna be better in most situations besides extreme ranges where the extra pen and velocity will come in handy. good thing there isnt a general nerf to nato gun accuracy… wait a second, that is the case here.
so effectively the only upside of the swedish 40mm, is the hevt shells. which last you for a whopping 1 second, unless you get extremely lucky and the plane comes in when youre fully loaded and can change the round giving you 1.8 seconds of firing time.
Fire rate, velocity, reload, gun dispersion. It’s all in all just a useless SPAA, Honestly should be removed until it gets its historical ammo values which gaijin has ignored and removed anytime it’s posted.
Just add the ItPsV 90 so that there’s something to take the ItPsV Leopard’s place if it goes up. It’s essentially the same thing but on the less capable T-55AM chassis, which should be much less controversial at the BR.
It’s just a slightly less mobile Wirbelwind that has worse ammunition and RoF and in exchange for not being as vulnerable to strafing, which is partially nullified by the more powerful cannons of many CAS you face around the current BR. It should oc still be noticeably higher in BR than the Wirbelwind since being moderately armored is huge for an SPAA, but this one attribute is being way overvalued at the moment. A BR of 4.7 would be fine.
As for other Oerlikon armed tanks, assuming you are referring to the Crusader II AA and AEC AA, there’s a whole host of bug reports on their inaccuracies that need to be addressed, which would result in both going down in BR in all likelihood.
1 Like