nearly all brits at 7,7 have a stab. The conquerer is good at 7,7 but not GOAT or OP so why move it? Its armor is situatinal and only worls on long distance. The addonarmor often fails to stop heat and the hull is one big weekspot with a good UFP combined with slow speed and slow reload 7,7 is totaly fine.
Id the KT 105 would have recived the same engin nerf it could have went back to 6,7. You trade little more pen for 1,5x reload time. The slightly larger mantle makes you aim for the 150mm viewport even more, additinaly the rangefinder are a weekspot too where anything with HE filler will obliberate your turret crew.
I got more often pen on the tiger 1 east wooden blocks by heat than i survived ap/aphe that should have killed me. They are optical and no way an improvement justifing putting it at same BR as tiger E
one, i have played the sidam and zsu 23, both are good for their intended role of close anti air support, aka you only go for targets that are under 1.5km, the sidams problem is simply the fact its far to high of a br for what it brings to the table, it should be 7.7
two, theyre good AT THEIR BR, but youre talking about uptiering them to 9.0 and above where they already struggle, in a 10.0 game they physically cant fight planes besides the chinese pgz09, which already sits at 9.0… because it gets ahead… ya its kinda clear you didnt really think this through and instead just got irrationally angry at spaa doing better than they should be and wanted them nerf, i mean its much better than that guy who just really sucks at cas and wants every handicap given to them.
and finally, you dont need to remove aphe, nor their apds, after all these vehicles always had these rounds and was never a problem like this(besides the DCA and falcon, their apds main belts was a problem), instead we need to fix what caused the problem in the first place, in this case its gaijin hot fix solution when they broke HE, by drastically increase the amount of fragments each round produced.
The 2s38 is the most powerful “light” vehicle at BR 10.7, and many players have even used it in battle at BR 12, demonstrating that the vehicle still functions as intended, which suggests its BR should be increased to at least BR 11.3.
squadron, i didn’t count any non TT one, also who ever says that the puma is better than the BMD-4s ?? and they are 9.7 just move the PUMA to 10.0 no one will get hurt
Ya no, people get those nukes in the za35 and itpzv (and only those vehicles) with first spawns, is purely because of luck, the amount of stuff that needs to align, the enemy spawning all on one side, all of them in light tanks or vehicles with light armour, and all of them not paying attention isn’t something you can repeat consistently.
Sure the itpzv had them more often when it was 8.3, but not at 8.7, but then again this is gaijin’s own mess, they couldve added the t55 marksmen instead and this wouldn’t be a problem.
Bmds all use the 9m117m1 missile, with a velocity of 370m/s, the tow 2 and tow 2a is 329m/s, tow 2b is an even slower 309m/s, i-tow is 296m/s (the tow is 299), spike lr 2 180m/s, the barrier atgms r2 is 280m/s, type 79 atgm is 200m/s, aps03 370m/s, gp105 370m/s, hj9 305m/s, mmp 260m/s, hot 2 250m/s, rb56 bill 2 is 250m/s, Falarick 105 is 370m/s.
So all other nations atgms are either on par or WORSE than the bmd’s atgms, the funny ironic part is, the only nation with better faster atgms, is Russia.
Spikes and other fire and forgets leave you out of danger, additionally, most of those other nations typically get APFSDS for their auto cannons, unlike the bmd.