The Conquerer is quite good at 7.7, it can and should be an 8.0
The only tanks lower than 8.0 with a full stab are light tanks that do little damage usually, and are easy to kill.
The armor package on the Conquerer makes it a beast, and can often eat Heat mo problem, also it will eat ATGMs that aren’t tandem, which is all you will see anyways.
The logs do more than you think, or and the tracks pieces don’t even break, and can often deflect your shells, in a hull down position, your practically invincible, and your only true competitor is the m4a3e2 jumbos.
Centurion MK2 is at 6.7 with full stad, Conquer is fine at 7.7 with 38km top speed 15sec of reload APDS shell that doesn’t does consistent damage and the Armour ain’t excellent
With gunner or without gunner if you shot the turret it’s disabled, if they hir your ammo all of it will be destroyed and will leave you defenseless, and they are way better IFV in maneuverability
Do you forget the cupola exist??? They are not tigers E, and still all the tanks that can pen the tiger H1 frontally or when it’s angled they can kill the ost/west the same way
As the Conquer thats why it’s fine at 6.7 and the Conquer at 7.7, as for the Tigers I never had experience such problem when I played them or fought them
He forgot to add that the M1 abrams should be move down at 9.3 or maybe 9.7 due to the 105 gun and poor mobility and reload and IPM1 to 10.7 with the M1A1 at 11.0 respectively.
The M1A1 HC, M1A2 and the AIM needs to be moved down to 11.3 due to the lack of good thermals on the M1A1 HC and M1A2 and for the AIM is due to the weaker dart sound it gets.
lastly the M1A2 SEP and SEP V2 need to be at 11.7 due to the turret ring weak spot and poor mobility, reload and the lack of spall liners.
M1 could also just get the M833 round already found on the M1IP. The round did enter service a bit before the IP, so it makes enough sense chronologically to let the M1 get it too. Maybe that would require the M1 to go up to 11.0. I’m not as familiar with modern vehicles and high rank meta, so it’s hard for me to say.
I’ve been told that the earliest produced M1’s did lack a few features, so perhaps that could be added to keep an M1 at the 10.3-10.7 range if adding M883 were to require the M1 to go up (assuming I was informed correctly about early M1’s).
The Dardo has a BR of 10.0 compared to the M3A3 Bradley (BR 9.7), even though the M3A3 Bradley has greater APFSDS penetration than the Italian Dardo… The reason you give to justify this is that the Italian Dardo has a higher rate of fire than the M3A3 Bradley… …Well, if this rule applies to Italy, it also applies to Russia:
Applying the same principle, the OTOMATIC has only 12 APFSDS rounds in its magazine and also has a lower rate of fire than the 2S38. Furthermore, in real life, as stated by the manufacturer, the 2S38 was designed as an SPAA, just like the OTOMATIC… But Gaijin classified it as a light vehicle so they could add scouting capabilities, making it even more powerful.
Other advantages the 2S38 has over the OTOMATIC:
Compared to the OTOMATIC, the 2S38 can perform scouting capabilities
Compared to the OTOMATIC, the 2S38 is an amphibious vehicle
Compared to the OTOMATIC, the 2S38 is faster and more manoeuvrable
Compared to the OTOMATIC, the 2S38 has a low profile, which translates to better survivability
The 2S38 has its ammunition stored in the centre of the hull, whereas the OTOMATIC has it scattered throughout the tank, which results in poorer survivability for the OTOMATIC… and better survivability for the 2S38
The 2S38 can fire all 148 rounds APFSDS without overheating and can fire all 148 APFSDS rounds continuously… Whereas the OTOMATIC has only 12 APFSDS rounds…
The Otomatic’s only advantage is the radar, but we both know that doesn’t justify its BR of 11.3 compared to the 2s38’s 10.7… So it’s obvious that the 2s38 must stay at BR 11.3 or the Otomatic be lowered to BR 10.7.
M1296 has : 30mm with APFSDS, Crewless turret, 100km max speed and -13km reverse
M3A3 has : 25mm with APFSDS and TOW missiles, 66km max speed and -15km reverse
Begleit has : 57mm with AP and TOW missiles, 75km max speed and -75km reverse
BMD-4M2 has : 30mm with APDS and a 100mm, 70km max speed and -20km reverse
Desert Warrior has : 25mm with APFSDS and TOW missiles, 75km max speed and -75km reverse
ICV (P) has : 30mm with APFSDS, Crewless turret, 100km max speed and -36km reverse
STRF 9040B has : 40mm with APFSDS , 70km max speed and -45km reverse
10.0 :
ZBD04A has : 30mm with APFSDS and 100mm, 70km max speed and -17km reverse
Dardo has : 25mm with APFSDS and TOW missiles, 70km max speed and -30km reverse
VCC-80/30 has : 30mm with APFSDS and TOW missiles, 70km max speed and -30km reverse
and final 10.3Light tanks:
STRF 9040BILL has : 40mm with APFSDS and TOW missiles, 70km max speed and -42km reverse
STRF 9040C has : 40mm with APFSDS, 70km max speed and -45km reverse
and last the PUMA with a 30mm APFSDS, Crewless turret and 70km max speed and -30km reverse
So overall the puma is from the last tanks in terms of firepower at 9.7-10.3 ( i didn’t even put the BMP2M), its in the middle in terms of speed and maneuverability and almost all of the rest Light tanks have a -10 depression, the only better is the survivability ( even if the 3 crew are next to each other and if you hit the turret you destroy all the ammo and that leaves you without ammo and all the optics, vertical and horizontal aiming drive will get destroyed) and the only unique is the IRCM that aint that good so tell me why the PUMA cant be 10.0?
The OTO have actually a slightly better hp/t (23.9 for the oto vs 23.3 for the 2s38)
Worse top-speed (60 km/h fort the oto vs 70 for the 2s38).
slightly better reverse (24 km/h fort the oto vs 20 for the 2s38).
So your solution to the problem of spaa are to good of a tank killer, by moving them to a br they have no chance of fighting planes so they can only fight tanks.
