so move the PUMA to 10.0/9.7???
1 Like
what? the are just Tiger H1 and the wood armor in the OST doesn’t stop anything maybe get a gaijin moment from an heatfs round but everything else is the exact same
you can remove them now but at least the t80UD should get the better transmission (there is a ukrainian T80UD that can go -22kmh in reverse )
yea until they rework APDS no, the shell brakes in anything
thats overkill
4 Likes
No. The rest of the Gepards should be 9.0 minimum anyways.
same br as same light tanks?? if you give them full apds belts ok but they never had them irl so maximum is 8.7
The APHE is stronger than APDS. You can kill a T-72 frontally with the APHE, but not with the APDS. The Gepards are stronger than pretty much all light tanks at that BR.
1 Like
no, and yes if you get lucky, APDS is better when you fight MBTs specially soviet, and they are SPAA even if people use them ad TD the br placement should be out of how effective they are against planes not tanks
is this excelent armor in the same room with us? the 300mm promised armor only work at very small areas at the outline of the turret. around the barrel: even short 88 pens there and kills the breach and some crew. the roof is no match for any non apds round (ap/aphe has enough angle pen and heat just overpressurs same as he) lower hull is week too, same as side, angle the hull over 5° and you get penned via the road weels. all thet for 15 sec reload and 38 max speed is nowhere near a leo1 or other 8,0. Also the “addon armor” cant even relyable stop heat or he)
2 Likes
The puma was added to the game as an 8.7 and is vastly more survivable.
It was literally unkillable at 8.7
-
The wooden armor on the tiger can directly stop 75mm rounds, as well as being angled can even stop some of the earlier 122mm rounds. It is more than enough. Secondly, the other Tiger has its roof weak spot better protected, and actually blends in decently.
-
I never have a problem with APDS, my only problem is the Conquerers reload, but I can easily play around that with the fully stabilized APDS launcher from hell. I loved spading that tank, and still maintain a high KDr in it.
-
No, that’s exactly where the ITPSV leopard should go. All those Gepard like tanks are still fabulously under Br’d especially the Gepard. Which can quite literally kill most tanks. You can barrel a tank so rapidly with its APHE rounds, then track, and hit the commanders hatch for a kill. It is egregious at the br it currently is. The Gepard like tanks can literally 1 tank IS-4’s through the roof hatches, or even shot trapping the lower part of the turret.
2 Likes
Shouldn’t even be stabilized, but Gajin decided to take a liberty modeling an inertia dampener used purely in long distance travel as a normal gun stabilizer.
Do you figure the Conq would need a BR change if it lost the stab?
1 Like
Yea at 8.7 not in 10.0/9.7, it can be killed by anything frontally and you can easily disable it
Yeah no. It still should be 10.0, as survivable as it is.
Otherwise we’d start dropping things like the 2s38 in br.
You compere a 57mm autocanon with proxy fuze shells with a 30mm ???
Doesn’t the Puma get AHEAD?
But lethality + survivability = be placement.
Fact is the puma is good where it is now. I see no reason to even debate it.
2s38 is where it should be now.
Dropping one affects the other.
Let’s bring WWII tanks into the modern era. This tank was removed from the game, so it’s not something you face every match, only a small number of veteran players own it. I have it and rarely use it. It’s not overpowered: it’s slow, easy to flank, and has a large turret ammo rack that can be one-shot, just like the Tiger II H and similar variants.
1 Like
The logs are 10mm not a deference, you can still see the cupola on the West (with the same logic let’s put all the Tiger H1 that use bushes to cover the cupola at 6.0), the conquest has a max speed of 38kmh and the armour isn’t even good and you want it to face 9.0?
The BMPT should get the dart round for “realism” but should get a module remake and moved up to 12.3 or 12.7 or even higher
Lol Puma with a 20mm (or even a 0.50cal) in the turret is out of the fight yea maybe the crew don’t die as easily but it’s ain’t great in overall survivability because all the systems are in the turret, and comparing 30mm Ahead rounds to a 57mm proxy is out of question
The BMPT dosnet have APFDS or even APDS in both canons they should remove the option that you can carry both of the cannons apds as it is in real life
1 Like
You might now use it, but I’ve met plenty of people that this is their most played vehicle, it’s also fake. And is better armored than the normal KT.
And you’re going to ask “how?” Well, thanks the larger turret mantle to accommodate the larger gun, it’s actually harder to pierce the front of the turret with a lot of guns, due to volumetric, and the whole shell size difference.
Secondly, its cannon, the 105mm is way better than the 88mm cannon, and can point and click with ease.
Just because you don’t play it doesn’t mean it’s bad.
That’s like saying the AMX m4 is bad, because I don’t play it, yet it’s actually a really mobile light medium tank.