Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

All Type 90s should not have to face 12.7, and should in fact be lower in BR than 11.7, especially because it only gets JM33, with 480mm of pen. Oh and don’t forget that the TK-XP is at 12.0, with pretty much the exact same stats as the Type 90, just with gen 3 thermals (Type 90s get gen 1) and still the same JM33. Also, Type 81 is heavily overtiered (yes, it has an insane missile but also no radar).

They were fine at 11.3 IMHO. They have really good reload, an okay shot, but their armor isn’t that great and the thermals suck as does their zoom.

They’re 12.0 material every day of the week, if not 12.3

They’re the fastest mbt.
They’re the fastest firing mbt.
They have great zoom.

And 480mm pen is enough to deal with everything easily except the Leo2a7s.

They have virtually no zoom.
Their armor is barely even there because GJN doesn’t believe they have armor.
They’re not that fast.
Their main shot is “not enough to deal with everything” and especially in frontal engagements is quite lacking.

Seriously, the type of argumentation you engage in constantly could be used to argue why the 2s38 should be 13.0. It’s dishonest, leaves out weaknesses and downsides, and overexaggerates strengths. Hell you could use it to argue that some WW2 stuff should be at that BR because “they have enough pen to pixel shot some modern MBTs from the side.”

Type 90s have absolutely terrible zoom.

1 Like

is that even a downside?
I struggle lot with Leopard 1 because of useless overzoomed optics, so having no zoom seems better to me than too much zoom. Especially on city maps

1 Like

Type 90 has base 9X zoom, so far too much actually. For reference, Leo 1 is 8x iirc.

2 Likes

73 km/h
And the highest acceleration due to low weight.

Yes they have low weight irl. They’re designed to fight in the mountainous terrain of Japan.

They have plenty of pen, just as Russian tanks technically do, despite Russian tanks having armor vs the type 90/10 being a mobility king.

You just want to bully with ease again.

Also, it has zoom, I think you mean to say it has no zoom levels?
Well that’s realistic.
Warthunder makes tank battles seem like cqb when in reality they aren’t

1 Like

Type 10/TKX is bad since literally BVM has same acceleration or even better so that makes no point.
Secondly shitty transmission
Thirdly it bleeds so much speed if you even slightly turn
list goes on…

Niki/Ps 183-1 Ground RB 3.0 → 8.0 worse armor than the T-126 but too fast and swedish bias, needs to go up now

Armour is almost as good as M1A1.
Not sure why people think it’s bad.

It should stay at 11.7 or even 12.0.
I don’t think its fair for a mobile 4s reload MBT with good turret armour, gun depression (via suspension controls) to lol-pen any 10.3 / 10.7 NATO MBT.

3 Likes

I remember funny days when teams were infested with Fuji at 11.3 and just lolpenning common vehicles in downtiers like TURMS, 80B, M1 and 2A4.

3 Likes

T-72B3A
12.3 → 12.0
This tank is the T-72B3M with the relikt-side bags removed and ARENA added at a whole 1.0 above it, This makes no sense, Even in the base scenarios APS is not worth a 1.0 br jump

M1A2 and M1A1 HC
12.0 → 12.3
This thing has the same performance as several 12.3 and 12.7 tanks, It has fast reload, good armor, Great mobility and a top tier dart

IPM1
11.3 → 11.7
Ditto reasons as M1A2, Incredible performance for their br that just puts all other same br tanks to shame

BMPT, BMPT-72
11.3 → 12.0
This thing is plain disgusting at its br, Broken survivability and firepower

5 Likes

VT4
12.3 → 12.0

Ive been scratching my head in confusion ever since this thing went up in battlerating to 12.3 What makes this thing a 12.3 tank?

4 Likes

You know, I’m amazed this thread still hasn’t been combined with the pinned BR thread.

Well, it’s a bit different. Also may have been around longer.

Yeah, look at the Type 87 RCV at 9.0

25mm gun with much less pen, no ERA and no Optical Detection or Laser Rangefinder.

reread the post
only the dogpoo t72 should go down

3 Likes

BR thread has been a thing forever, this definitely isn’t older. Normally all “Change BR For X” gets merged into it.

M1296 “Dragoon” 9.7 → 9.0
Reason: being a weaker in firepower Stryker, and having abysmal Power to weight, it’s a bit surprising that this was added to the game as an 9.7, it is overly difficult to play even for a stock grinded tank. It has no business meeting 10.7s and barely even 10.3s. In a perfect world, it should be a 9.0 and can only meet 8.3s

2 Likes