If only they’d keep that rule consistent…
Achilles still has the same reload as the Sherman Firefly 😅
ah then no. i dont use the bush on my KV-7. I believe it would have been better if i used, but i just despice that tactic with heavy tanks.
Well, that is credits to you. Honestly.
I don’t have any bushes (I don’t buy em from the BP store either), I just use whatever shield or other big decoration I have to try and mask weaker points. A little scummy, but not nearly as confusing for enemies as bushes are.
well it usually leads me to end up reloading with the enemy behind the same house as me :3
1 Like
What’s the Russian translate to? I can’t read Cyrillic
I used them when i was a newbie, to cover the panther`s turret xD but now heavy machines rarely see them. and dont see them to cover weakspots at all
I still use bushes on some light machines tho so i cant take much credit
well, i made it when the event was going, so it has some “factory engeneering team” vibes.
It reads like “More cannons? More steel? So the armor wont be penned? Katysha orders - we do!”
Its a Girls und Panzer reference
That’s not how that works at all.
The T29 is a premium. And can be side grade to the T32.
T34 will take the 7.0 place along with the T26E5.
Finally making 5.7 and 6.0 less toxic to play, because of the abusive USA and German 6.7 - 7.0 tanks that are poorly balanced.
M103 could be 8.0 and that would be fine, but as it is, I don’t see a reason to make it so.
This is a lot of preference. But you can sit yourself if whatever Soviet tank you want. Give me a T26E5, T30, T34, or T29 and I will beat you every time.
Additionally. The extra HMGs are a huge advantage, as they only have to be controlled by the gunner. Where as other HMGs are commander use.
Meaning with a dead commander you still have a large advantage.
Well, this list isn’t just my input. It’s a mix of everyone’s input.
What do you believe makes it what br you suggest?
Maybe controversial but at the moment T32 is 7.0 material at best.
The T29 is just worse than the T32.
T34 is not fit for 7.0.
This certainly isn’t fit for 7.0.
You’re just killing off iconic vehicles to try to “fix” 6.0-7.0 that doesn’t really need fixing.
M103 isn’t even considered a good 7.7.
IS-6 easy clap. T-10A also easy clap.
2 Likes
Don’t forget IS-4M, since he loves coax '50 calls so much
IS-4 is even easier than the two I listed, since the literal only option he has is to barrel snipe
Honestly, I don’t mind the T34 at 7.0, I use it alongside the M46 since that thing is an actual gem. Not so much the T98, not a big fan of that lol.
1 Like
Massively agree there. I do think it should get ~5.5 second reload and T45 HVAP as compensation though if they move it up.
It’s also missing driver dual controls, which would give it a small boost to survivability. Basically every non-Sherman US tank between the M5 Stuart and M46 for that matter had dual driver controls that haven’t been added. That includes all the prototype heavy tanks.
You should, it wouldn’t be competitive. Uptiering a vehicle by choice is one thing, making its default BR 7.0 is another.
I mean maybe? Idk I just don’t do terrible with it even in full uptiers though it may just be my playstyle.
Really then show us… according to statshark for everything you have with more than 50 battles in sorted by k/d from highes to lowest and im leaving out the low tier stuff
T29 is 15st.… with 2.4 after bunch of busted russian vehicles followed by some german stuff that you dont complain about…
T29E5 is 35th
T34 is 150th
T30 - you dont have
So clearly you do really well in these US “handheld vehicles” compared to the ones from what nation again… (mostly)?
Suprise was T58 where you have like 4.1 K/D and actually a lot of games compared to others… but i guess abusing the busted vehicle of the time is what you do… but T29, T29E5, T34 those are the evil ones that needs to go up because your Surbaissé failed to pen it… sure…
And everyone knows the T58 is bit busted but its hard to know what to do with it… propably some nerf, it should not go higher without stabilizer.