Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

I mean, there was only 1 begleit irl, it would be odd to have 2 in the tt imo. Though the begleit is one of my favorite tanks as well.

Maybe I should have listed these as border vehicles. They are both incredibly strong, especially the T29, to the point that I can play them with pretty much no effort and still get really good stats in them.

Yeah that is also fully fair.

Terrible logic. Literally nothing at any BR should be facing terminators. It’s no excuse to move your favorite tanks down.

1 Like

2 Likes

i dont even have them, i use the BMPT as the most broken think in the game a tank with only a 30mm has no place in the same br as the M1128 or BMP-2M, and TAM 2C isnt that great 2S25M does the same and its at 10.0

If they gave it darts it would be an easy 10.3 or 10.7

It has little armor, well… guess what? it should have more armor, but gaijin refuses to fix it.


20260312_21005520260312_210411

6 Likes

They should be 7.3 to be fair to other nations.

As they are very trolly and potent tanks. The t30 would be a 7.0 though

The IS-6 was a 7.0 as is the T29. IS-6 is now 7.7, so why isn’t the T29 7.3 when it is just as good?

Shoots the worst spot, expects a kill?

I’d be fine with that as long as it got hot 2 missiles.

If I had a nickel for every OP or shit vehicle that was actually just implemented wrong, I could just buy out Gajin to get reports fixed.

What does a T29 offer for a 7.7 vehicle

No? You just want non-USSR vehicles uptiered. It’s pretty plain to see. You have an EXTREME USSR favoritism bias. What do either of these offer as a 7.3 or 7.7 vehicle?

4 Likes

Incorrect. Please use your eyes. If anything I have an “extreme” Italian bias.

Your just upset I put a tank you like on the list.

I’ve played a lot more vehicles than you if I recall, and know where nations are too strong or too weak, well balanced, or imbalanced.

Plus, saying that I have a bias is funny, when you have a 3.01 KDr in the T29 yourself, and you main air.
Coincidence?

This has to be ragebait… you lose more of my respect everytime you reply

2 Likes

To be fair, the T29 is pretty strong at 7.0 and requires pretty much 0 effort to do well in (at least I barely have to try to maintain my stats in it).

Whether it should be moved up is a debate I’m mostly staying out of though.

1 Like

The T29 and T30 are far from trolly and potent. The T-34-85 is trolly and potent, having extremely BS volumetric (casually absorbing long 88s for some reason) and has both the mobility and firepower to compete at its BR.

The T29 and T30, however, have very easy to hit and well defined weakspots, they’re sluggish, they’re massive targets, and their reload stops them from being aggressive.

The T26E-1 at the same BR does everything the T34/30/29 does, but better.

Man, you come up with the most incorrect information ever.

I will gladly test your theory. I’ll get my KT out, (since you said long 88, and you can drive a T-34-85)

T29 and T30 can often bounce a lot more than your giving them credit for, sure they have their weak points, just as anything else does.
But they have good mobility, a decent reload for a 105, 3x or 4x HMGs which instantly disengage tracks, and can even barrel tanks.

T26E1 isn’t better than the T34/30/29 lol… that’s why I left it out of the list.

1 Like

So, let me get this straight. You don’t deny it, and have no valid response, so… you call rage bait?

Classic.

And I don’t care for your respect. I care for the respect of good balancing and Fun in the game.